Zimbabwe: ICJ holds Judges Symposium

Zimbabwe: ICJ holds Judges Symposium

The ICJ and the Judicial Service Commission of Zimbabwe held the End of Term Symposium for the judiciary of Zimbabwe at the Troutbeck Inn in Nyanga, 31 March – 2 April 2016.

Chief Justice Chidyausiku in his opening remarks at the End of Term Symposium, stated that the Symposia are important because they give judges an opportunity to meet and engage with each other on various issues of interest or concern.

Additionally the purpose of the Symposium is to improve the quality of service in terms of judgments and the speedy outcome of cases.

In attendance at the Symposium were 72 delegates including judges from the Supreme Court, High Court and Labour Court, as well as representatives from the Law Society of Zimbabwe.

The programme included a joint session with all the courts in attendance, to discuss topics of judicial ethics and case management.

New ICJ report scrutinizes judicial independence and accountability in Swaziland

New ICJ report scrutinizes judicial independence and accountability in Swaziland

Today the ICJ launched a new report that makes several findings and recommendations regarding the independence and accountability of the judiciary in the country.

The report is a result of the International Fact Finding Mission in Swaziland (IFFM-SZ) held in 2015 by the ICJ, in collaboration with the Africa Judges and Jurists Forum (AJJF), Judges for Judges Netherlands (J4J) and the Commonwealth Magistrates’ and Judges’ Association (CMJA).

The mission was conducted at the backdrop of a number developments of concern for the independence and accountability of the judiciary in Swaziland.

The report observes that:

  • The Kingdom of Swaziland has a constitutional and legislative framework that does not respect the separation of powers or provide the necessary legal and institutional framework and safeguards to ensure the independence of the judiciary;
  • The former Chief Justice Ramodibedi failed to protect and defend the institutional independence of the judiciary;
  • The Executive failed to respect the independence of the judiciary; and
  • The failure to respect the independence of the judiciary by the Executive and the failure by the Chief Justice to defend the institutional independence of the judiciary created conditions conducive to abuse of the legal system for personal gain

Presenting the Mission’s findings, the ICJ Africa Regional Programme Director, Arnold Tsunga urged the Crown, Judiciary, civil society and international community to collectively work towards the implementation of the recommendations to strengthen the institutional and structural independence of the judiciary thereby restoring citizen’s and stakeholders confidence in the judiciary and the rule of law.

Contact

Arnold Tsunga, ICJ Regional Director for Africa, t: +27 73 131 8411, e: arnold.tsunga(a)icj.org

Swaziland-Justice locked out RoL crisis-Publications-Fact Finding Mission Report-2016-ENG (full report, in PDF)

Namibia: ICJ’s submission to the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

Namibia: ICJ’s submission to the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

In mid-February 2016, the ICJ made a submission to the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in advance of Committee’s examination of Namibia’s combined Initial, First and Second Periodic Reports under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.

In its submission, the organization drew the Committee’s attention to the detrimental impact of the extant criminalization of consensual anal intercourse between males and of other various forms of sexual activities between consenting men through the crime of “unnatural sexual offences” on the enjoyment of Covenant rights, including, in particular, the principle of non-discrimination and the right to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health by gay and bisexual men and, more generally, by the gay, bisexual, lesbian and transgender community in the country.

The ICJ’s submission contains a number of recommendations that the organization considers the Committee should address to the Namibian’s authorities to address its concerns.

(Full text in PDF)

Translate »