Jul 11, 2008
In Argentina, the Constitution grants the President broad powers with regard to the appointment of judges to the Supreme Court of Justice and federal courts.
For many years, the judiciary has been regarded as subordinate to the executive. At provincial level, complaints of executive interference in the judiciary are also frequent. Recent judicial reforms adopted mainly during 2003 as a result of two presidential decrees, and new legislation adopted in some provinces in response to a general lack of confidence in the justice system, have ensured that there is greater consultation and outside scrutiny with regard to appointments to the Supreme Court and the prosecution service.
Some provinces have adopted similar reforms ensuring that there is a degree of scrutiny in the appointment of judges. Also during 2003, impeachment proceedings initiated by Congress resulted in the removal or resignation of four Supreme Court justices who were generally perceived as being subordinate to the government of former President Carlos Menem (1989-1999).
During 2004, concern about increasing crime rates and lack of security has become one of the most debated judicial reform issues. On 14 June 2005, the notorious amnesty laws (the Full Stop and Due Obedience Laws) were declared unconstitutional and null and void by the Supreme Court of Argentina. This ruling should pave the way for the prosecution of perpetrators of serious human rights violations during the military dictatorship (1976-1983).
Argentina-Attacks on Justice 2005-Publications-2008 (full text, PDF)
Jul 11, 2008
Although an independent judiciary largely functions in practice in Jamaica, it operates within an overburdened system with inadequate resources.
The government has launched a three-year reform plan to modernize and improve the court system and the effectiveness of the judiciary. Legislation was enacted in 2004 to abolish appeals to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and make the Caribbean Court of Justice Jamaica’s highest appellate authority.
The Privy Council declared this legislation unconstitutional in February 2005 on procedural grounds. New legislation was under discussion as of April 2005.
In March 2004, the Social Conflict and Legal Reform, a five-year-long initiative to foster mediation and alternative dispute resolution methods at both the institutional and community levels, came to an end. It succeeded in establishing mediation centres in several deprived areas.
Budgetary and political constraints have severely undermined the effectiveness and impartiality of the Police Public Complaints Authority (PPCA) in investigating alleged abuses by state security forces.
Jamaica-Attacks on Justice 2005-Publications-2008 (full text, PDF)
Jul 10, 2008 | Comunicados de prensa, Noticias
Una misión de expertos nacionales e internacionales visitó la ciudad de Oaxaca para recabar información sobre la administración de justicia en el estado, con especial atención a la independencia del Poder Judicial.
Con base en la información recibida con anterioridad a la visita y durante ella se concluye preliminarmente que existen condiciones estructurales y prácticas que ponen seriamente en riesgo que el poder judicial ejerza sus funciones de manera independiente.”
“En suma, DPLF, la CIJ y Fundar observan con preocupación que en Oaxaca persisten serias deficiencias en la organización y el funcionamiento del sistema judicial. Estas deficiencias obedecen tanto a normativa inadecuada como a ciertas prácticas que impiden la prestación del servicio de justicia. Las organizaciones que participaron en la misión exhortan al Estado oaxaqueño a reformar aquellas prácticas y regulaciones incompatibles con los estándares internacionales antes mencionados. Lamentablemente, de manera preliminar, la misión observa que muchos de ellos no están siendo respetados en Oaxaca.”
Mexico-Oaxaca mission-press release-2008 (en PDF)
Jul 10, 2008 | News
Una misión de expertos nacionales e internacionales visitó la ciudad de Oaxaca para recabar información sobre la administración de justicia en el estado, con especial atención a la independencia del Poder Judicial.
Jul 10, 2008
The independence of the judiciary in Colombia is seriously compromised, particularly within the Attorney General’s Office, where prosecutors are being pressured to comply with the policies of the government.
In addition, lawyers – especially human rights lawyers and defenders – are subjected to harassment, threats and persecution by the government, guerrilla and paramilitary groups, preventing them from discharging their professional duties in an independent manner.
The government has submitted several controversial proposals to Congress concerning reforms to the judiciary that undermine the role of the Constitutional Court (Corte Constitucional) and the Higher Judicial Council (Consejo Superior de la Judicatura) and could lead to the creation of a judiciary that is heavily accountable to the executive (Poder Ejecutivo).
The constant efforts of the government to push through radical legal and constitutional reforms not only undermine the independence of the judiciary but also create legal chaos.
Colombia-Attacks on Justice 2005-Publications-2008 (full text, PDF)
