May 16, 2013 | News
La CIJ hoy expresó su preocupación ante la posibilidad de que la sentencia emitida días atrás por el Juzgado de Mayor Riesgo A en el juicio por Genocidio y Delito contra los Deberes de Humanidad sea anulada.
La CIJ tambien expresó su preocupación que el proceso contra el General Efraín Rios Montt (photo) por Genocidio y Delitos contra los Deberes de Humanidad tenga que repetirse.
La Corte de Constitucionalidad (CC) está examinando recursos legales planteados relacionados a la sentencia de 80 años de cárcel contra el exjefe de Estado.
Durante todo el juicio, los jueces del Tribunal recibieron presiones constantes, no solo de parte de los abogados de la defensa, sino que también de otros grupos externos que promueven más impunidad en este caso, dijó la CIJ.
Además, constantemente los abogados de la defensa presentaron diferentes recursos de amparo y otros recursos legales, con el único fin de obstaculizar el proceso y no permitir que se emitiera sentencia.
Frente a todos estos ataques, los jueces del Tribunal de Mayor Riesgo A demostraron una conducta intachable, apegada a derecho y con una firme determinación de terminar con la impunidad que ha existido alrededor de este caso.
Ramón Cadena, Director de la Oficina de la Comisión Internacional de Juristas para Centro América expresó: “Sería muy negativo para el Estado de Guatemala si se llega a anular la sentencia. La impunidad que ha existido ha hecho mucho daño a la población y a las víctimas quienes habían perdido la fe en la justicia.”
Finalmente, Cadena puntualizó: “Es más valioso que un Estado reconozca mediante una sentencia que se cometieron graves crímenes de guerra, de lesa humanidad y genocidio, a seguir escondiendo su responsabilidad con diferentes mecanismos de impunidad.”
May 10, 2013 | News
La CIJ celebra que el proceso contra el General Efraín Rios Montt (center on the photo) por Genocidio y Delitos contra los Deberes de Humanidad haya concluido el viernes 10 de mayo en la ciudad de Guatemala.
La CIJ observó el debate por medio del abogado Miguel Moerth y apoyó proceso y el debido cumplimiento del Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos y del Derecho Internacional Humanitario por medio del peritaje presentado por el Director de su oficina para Centroamérica.
Dicha oficina se ha mantenido atenta y ha abogado por el derecho de las víctimas a la verdad y la justicia.
Durante el proceso la CIJ llamó la atención sobre el uso abusivo de la figura del amparo, recusaciones, incidentes y otros recursos presentados por la defensa que pretendieron en diferentes momentos anular u obstaculizar el desarrollo del juicio.
La CIJ respalda decididamente al Tribunal de Mayor Riesgo “A” por haber llevado a cabo su difícil tarea, con respeto a las normas del debido proceso y la garantía del derecho de defensa de los acusados y, por haber resistido con las presiones recibidas durante el juicio, que incluyeron amenazas contra integridad personal de miembros del Tribunal.
La CIJ considera que el derecho de las víctimas a un juicio justo e imparcial y a conocer la verdad de los hechos, ha sido respetado con las acciones llevadas a cabo durante el juicio por dicho Tribunal.
Wilder Tayler, Secretario General de la Comisión Internacional de Juristas expresó: “Celebramos este triunfo de la Justicia sobre la Impunidad. Después de 30 años y de tanto esfuerzo, el derecho a la justicia de las víctimas ha sido respetado; la sociedad guatemalteca ha dado un primer y muy importante paso en el camino hacia la reconciliación. Esta sentencia fortalece el Sistema de Justicia en Guatemala y constituye un importante precedente para evitar que crímenes tan graves puedan repetirse. Constituye igualmente un ejemplo para toda la región americana en su combate contra la impunidad”.
Photo: Bettman/Corbias
Apr 20, 2013 | Advocacy, News, Non-legal submissions
The ICJ today condemned the execution by the Government of Taiwan of six prisoners, convicted on charges of murder, on 19 April 2013. It follows the earlier execution of six convicted persons in December 2012.
Twenty-one executions have been carried out in Taiwan since April 2010, shattering a de facto moratorium of the death penalty that had been respected by the Government since December 2005.
“The Government of Taiwan’s execution of 12 people in the last six months constitutes a serious and unacceptable assault on the right to life and human dignity”, said Alex Conte, Director of the ICJ International Law & Protection Programmes. “These executions also place Taiwan at odds with the international community, which has adopted with increasingly large majorities since December 2007 the UN General Assembly resolutions calling for a worldwide moratorium on executions”, Conte added.
This new round of executions are especially lamentable in light of the encouraging step recently taken by the country to invite an international group of experts to review the measures adopted by the Government to promote and protect human rights. The recommendations to the Government of Taiwan, formulated by those experts, and welcomed by the ICJ and other rights groups, included intensifying efforts towards the abolition of capital punishment and the recommendation that Taiwan “as a first and decisive step, immediately introduces a moratorium on executions in accordance with the respective resolutions of the UN General Assembly”.
The ICJ believes that the use of the death penalty constitutes a violation of the right to life and the right not to be subjected to cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment.
ICJ and other rights groups encourage Taiwan on domestic implementation of human rights (see ICJ and other rights groups’ statement on Taiwan’s human rights review process)
Mar 27, 2013 | Agendas, Events
Lawyers from all five Central Asian countries participate in the seminar (28-29 March 2013) to discuss the independence of bar associations and problems faced by lawyers in working independently and effectively.
This ICJ roundtable seminar, organized in cooperation with the Central Asian League of Lawyers and to be held in Almaty, Kazakhstan, will address issues including the self-governance and organization of bar associations, their relationships with state bodies, lawyers and the public, entrance to the legal profession, lawyers’ codes of ethics, and disciplinary proceedings against lawyers.
It will also discuss problems faced by lawyers in criminal cases, in both the pre-trial and trial stages, and incidents of harassment or intimidation of lawyers.
Europe-CIS-ICJ Seminar Central Asia-event-agenda-2013 (full text in pdf)
Mar 4, 2013 | News
The ICJ expressed its concern over the criminal trial of 94 individuals, including judges, lawyers, academics, human rights defenders and civil society activists, in the State Security Chamber of the UAE Federal Supreme Court.
Following a wave of arbitrary arrests and detention, which began in March 2012, the case was referred to the Supreme Court on 27 January 2013.
“The ICJ is gravely concerned over the fairness of the upcoming proceedings, including the lack of any right of appeal, the lack of restrictions on the use of evidence obtained through torture or ill-treatment and severe restrictions imposed on the rights of the defence, in contravention of international human rights law, including the Arab Charter on Human Rights, to which the UAE is a party,” said Said Benarbia, ICJ Senior Legal Adviser of the Middle East and North Africa Programme. “Furthermore, allegations of torture and ill-treatment by detainees, including incommunicado detention, prolonged solitary confinement, sleep deprivation and verbal and physical abuse, must be promptly, impartially and thoroughly investigated.”
The ICJ further notes that there have been violations of international fair standards.
These include the failure of State authorities to formally charge defendants, severe restrictions on access to legal counsel, including during questioning and the failure to disclose case files to the defence until a few days before trial.
Until two weeks before the trial, there was a single lawyer acting for all detainees and other lawyers who tried to assist have faced harassment, including detention and deportation, the ICJ says.
The trial is part of a broader crackdown by the UAE authorities in response to a petition signed by 100 academics, legal professionals, and civil society activists, in March 2011, for political reforms and increased public participation in government.
“The ICJ condemns the use of criminal proceedings to suppress peaceful calls for increased democracy as an unlawful restriction on the right to freedom of expression,” Benarbia added. “Extending the clampdown on critics to include numerous members of the legal profession severely compromises the Rule of Law in the UAE.”
Contact:
Said Benarbia, ICJ Senior Legal Adviser of the Middle East and North Africa Programme, tel: 41 22 979 38 17, e-mail: said.benarbia(at)icj.org
