Philippines: NGOs urge Human Rights Council to take effective action

Philippines: NGOs urge Human Rights Council to take effective action

The ICJ has joined other NGOs in urging the UN Human Rights Council to respond effectively to the crisis for human rights in the Philippines.

The joint oral statement was delivered by the World Organization against Torture (OMCT) on behalf of the group of international and Philippino NGOs, during a general debate on country situations. It read as follows:

“Madam President,

I speak on behalf of 35 organisations, deeply concerned by the situation in the Philippines. We urge this Council to respond credibly to the grave findings and recommendations of the recent OHCHR report.

Developments since that report indicate further deterioration, with ongoing incitement to kill by the President, the promotion of an architect of the anti-drug strategy to police chief, the passing of an overbroad anti-terror law ripe for abuse, the conviction of journalist Maria Ressa and shutdown of media network ABS-CBN, the murder of activists and a journalist and a new spike in police killings.

In terms of cooperation, the Philippines refused access to OHCHR in the preparation of the report and continues to bar entry to Special Procedures. The Secretary-General and High Commissioner have raised significant concerns over reprisals. The Government does not acknowledge widespread and systematic killings as a problem, in fact it encourages them and rejects the OHCHR’s findings. Serious violations continue.

The Government’s announced Inter-Agency Panel lacks any transparency and directly involves branches of Government implicated in these abuses. As such, it clearly cannot satisfy international standards of independence,[1] nor can it be seen as credible or safe for victims to engage with.

Madam President,

Our organisations have urged and continue to urge this Council to launch an independent international investigation.

The High Commissioner has clearly asked the Council to renew her mandate to monitor and report on the wider situation, as well as to provide technical cooperation to “implement the report’s recommendations,” and “continue to pursue accountability”. We urge this Council – at absolute minimum – to ensure continued monitoring and reporting on all aspects of the situation as clearly recommended by the High Commissioner. Anything less would not only be an insult to victims and their families, but send a green light to perpetrators that they can continue with impunity, with disastrous consequences on the ground.

Thank you.”

Co-signatories:

  1. Action Network Human Rights Philippines (AMP)
  2. Amnesty International
  3. Article 19
  4. Child Alert Mindanao
  5. Children’s Legal Rights and Development Center (CLRDC)
  6. CIVICUS Alliance
  7. Coalition Against Summary Executions
  8. Families of Victims of Involuntary Disappearance (FIND)
  9. Franciscans International
  10. Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate Conception
  11. Free Legal Assistance Group (FLAG)
  12. Freedom House
  13. Harm Reduction International
  14. Human Rights Watch
  15. In Defense of Human Rights and Dignity Movement (iDEFEND)
  16. International Coalition for Human Rights in the Philippines (ICHRP)
  17. International Commission of Jurists
  18. International Drug Policy Consortium
  19. International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH)
  20. International Service for Human Rights
  21. Karapatan Alliance Philippines
  22. Medical Action Group
  23. National Union of Journalists of the Philippines
  24. Network Against Killings in the Philippines (NakPhil)
  25. Partnership Mission for People’s Initiatives (PMPI)
  26. Philippine Alliance of Human Rights Advocates (PAHRA)
  27. Philippine Misereor Partnership Inc. (PMPI)
  28. Philippine Human Rights Information Center
  29. Salinlahi Alliance for Children’s Concerns
  30. Swiss Catholic Lenten Fund (SCLF)
  31. Tambayan
  32. The Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA)
  33. Task Force Detainees of the Philippines
  34. World Council of Churches
  35. World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT)

[1] See for instance the UN Principles on the Effective Prevention and Investigation of Extra-legal, Arbitrary and Summary Executions, adopted by the Economic and Social Council in its resolution 1989/65 of 24 May 1989; and Human Rights Committee, General Comment no. 36 on the right to life (article 6).

Declaración oral de la CIJ en el Diálogo Interactivo sobre el Informe de la Misión Internacional para la Determinación de los Hechos en Venezuela

Declaración oral de la CIJ en el Diálogo Interactivo sobre el Informe de la Misión Internacional para la Determinación de los Hechos en Venezuela

La CIJ denunció hoy la continua impunidad en Venezuela, reforzada por la falta de independencia judicial, en el Consejo de Derechos Humanos de la ONU en Ginebra.

La declaración oral, emitida en un diálogo interactivo con la Misión Internacional para la Determinación de los Hechos establecida por el Consejo, decía lo siguiente:

Señora presidenta,

La Comisión Internacional de Juristas (CIJ) agradece el informe de la Misión y los esfuerzos que permitieron su elaboración y presentación teniendo en cuenta los retos derivados de la pandemia de la COVID-19.

La CIJ comparte las preocupaciones relativas a la falta de cooperación del gobierno con la Misión de Determinación de los Hechos. La CIJ recuerda que, conforme al derecho internacional, Venezuela tiene la obligación de asegurar la rendición de cuentas sobre las graves violaciones de derechos humanos que ocurren en el país.

La CIJ resalta que las violaciones documentadas en este informe se produjeron en medio de una ruptura gradual de las instituciones democráticas y del estado de derecho en Venezuela.

La CIJ ha documentado desde hace varios años la falta de independencia judicial y la ausencia de rendición de cuentas en el país por violaciones de derechos humanos, lo cual ha profundizado la impunidad.

La CIJ destaca la importante contribución de la Misión de Determinación de los Hechos a la rendición de cuentas por graves violaciones de derechos humanos en Venezuela, y urge al Consejo a extender y fortalecer el mandato de la Misión. La CIJ alienta a la Misión a examinar y ahondar con mayor detalle en las causas de las violaciones, los obstáculos de larga data que han impedido obtener rendición de cuentas en el nivel nacional, e incluir un análisis del rol y la responsabilidad de los individuos e instituciones del sistema de justicia por las violaciones y la impunidad.[1]

Finalmente, la CIJ invita a los expertos a ahondar en la recomendación realizada en el informe a los Estados respecto de “iniciar acciones legales contra los individuos responsables de las violaciones y los crímenes identificados”.

Gracias.

 

 

[1] Véase, CIJ, Practitioners Guide no. 13: Judicial Accountability, Disponible en: https://www.icj.org/icj-launches-new-practitioners-guide-on-judicial-accountability/

Translate »