Jan 19, 2024 | News
On 15-16 January 2024, the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ), in cooperation with ARTICLE 19, organized a workshop in the province of Chiang Mai where over two dozen civil society actors and human rights defenders considered how to invoke and apply international law and standards related to land. The goal was to advocate for better protection of the human rights of affected individuals and communities across Thailand.
“Access to, use of, and control over land can have direct and indirect implications for the enjoyment of a range of human rights, particularly those under the International Covenant on the Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) to which Thailand is a party,” said Seree Nonthasoot, Member of the United Nations Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (CESCR).
Thailand has a long-standing track record of failing to meet its human rights obligations related to land, especially concerning Indigenous Peoples, peasants, and other traditional communities, many of which have a material and spiritual relationship with their ancestral lands. Violations include the failure to ensure the security of tenure and meaningful and effective participation of communities in land-related decision-making processes.
Large-scale forced evictions conducted in violation of international law, inadequate and inconsistent compensation provided to affected communities and individuals due to land-related policies, and displacement of entire communities that are consequently struggling to access livelihoods without adequate support from the State have also been reported.
“When the social, cultural, spiritual, economic, environmental, and political value of land for communities is systematically disregarded by domestic law, international law and standards become important tools for victims and civil society to use in their advocacy for the protection of human rights. International mechanisms also offer crucial avenues for exposing serious human rights violations and seeking accountability,” added Sanhawan Srisod, ICJ’s Legal Adviser.
The workshop aimed to build participants’ documentation skills, strengthen their advocacy and promote networking. Further, the training explored different approaches and the benefits of engaging with UN human rights mechanisms for the protection of human rights in relation to land. The workshop provided a space for participants to discuss how civil society actors can utilize the outputs of these mechanisms in their activities, as well as how to effectively communicate with such mechanisms to ensure that their engagement is strategic and productive.
Background
Speakers included:
- Pairoj Ponpesh, Adviser, National Human Rights Commission of Thailand
- Pratubjit Neelapaijit, National Human Rights Officer, OHCHR’s Regional Office for Southeast Asia
- Sanhawan Srisod, Legal Adviser, ICJ
- Seree Nonthasoot, Member of the United Nations Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights
Unofficial translations of key CESCR’s jurisprudences into Thai were also provided and shared with the participants. These included:
For more information regarding the legal framework, policies, and practices related to land in the context of the establishment and development of special economic zones (SEZs) against international law and standards, available in English and Thai.
Contact:
Sanhawan Srisod, Associate International Legal Adviser, ICJ Asia Pacific Programme; e: sanhawan.srisod@icj.org
Jan 18, 2024 | News
Lawyers for Lawyers, the International Observatory for Lawyers (OIAD), The Law Society of England and Wales (LSEW), the European Association of Lawyers for Democracy & Human Rights (ELDH), the Union of International Lawyers’ Institute for The Rule of Law (UIA-IROL), the International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute (IBAHRI), and the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) condemn the continued harassment against human rights lawyer Aleksey Ladin.
On 24 January 2024, the International Day of the Endangered Lawyer, human rights defender and lawyer Aleksey Ladin will face a disciplinary hearing by the Council of the Tyumen Regional Bar Association. The action was initiated by a motion issued by the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation. Mr. Ladin has been working since 2015 to provide legal aid to Ukrainians who are alleged to have been subject to criminal prosecution by Russia on politically motivated charges. Since 2017, he has been based in Russian-occupied Crimea, mostly representing Ukrainian and Crimean Tatar political prisoners.
This is the latest in series of instances of harassment and prosecution from the authorities against Mr. Ladin. On 13 October 2023, the Kyivskyi District Court of Simferopol sentenced him to 14 days of administrative detention for allegedly displaying prohibited symbols on his social media pages. The Facebook post in question, a photo of a drawing made by one of his clients, displayed elements of Ukrainian and Crimean Tatar national emblems with the slogan “We are not the terrorists and we are not the extremists.” The court found the “taraq tamga” (the emblem on the Crimean Tatars’ flag) in the picture to be a symbol of a known Crimean volunteer paramilitary unit, Noman Çelebicihan Crimean Tatar Volunteer Battalion. The drawing had no relation to the battalion. Mr. Ladin was prosecuted for the exercise of his right to freedom expression, protected under international and Russian law.
The upcoming disciplinary hearing is based on the sentence of administrative detention handed down on 13 October 2023, as the Ministry of Justice alleges that Mr. Ladin violated the Code of Ethics of the Russian Bar Association, which is based on the Federal Law “On the Bar Association and its activities in the Russian Federation.” The Ministry of Justice affirms that they received this information from the Centre to Counteract Extremism in Crimea on 3 November 2023.
Lawyers play a vital role in upholding the rule of law and the protection of human rights guaranteed under international law, including the rights to an effective remedy and fair trial guarantees, and the right of freedom from torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment. Their work is indispensable for public confidence in the administration of justice by safeguarding due process rights and ensuring access to justice for all. To fulfil their professional duties effectively, lawyers should be able to practice their profession safely and should be free from improper interference, fear of reprisals, and illegitimate restrictions, in compliance with international standards.
The UN Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers states that ‘Governments shall ensure that lawyers (a) are able to perform all of their professional functions without intimidation, hindrance, harassment or improper interference; (…) and (c) shall not suffer, or be threatened with, prosecution or administrative, economic or other sanctions for any action taken in accordance with recognized professional duties, standards and ethics’ [16]. They also hold that ‘lawyers shall not be identified with their clients or their clients’ causes as a result of discharging their functions’ [18] and that ‘lawyers, like any other citizens, are entitled to freedom of expression, belief, association and assembly’ [23].
In view of the above, the undersigned organisations call on the Tyumen Regional Bar Association, the Russian Federal Bar Association and the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation to:
- Immediately drop the disciplinary proceedings against human rights lawyer Aleksey Lapin, as he is being targeted as a result of his peaceful and legitimate activities;
- Ensure that any legitimate disciplinary proceedings against lawyers shall be conducted fairly and independently, in accordance with international standards;
- Refrain from any actions that may constitute harassment, persecution, or undue interference in the work of lawyers, including disciplinary or criminal proceedings on improper grounds, such as the nature of the cases in which the lawyer is involved;
- Guarantee that all lawyers in Russia and Russian-occupied Crimea are able to carry out their legitimate professional activities without fear of reprisals and free of all restrictions including judicial harassment, arbitrary arrest, deprivation of liberty, or other arbitrary sanctions.
Jan 17, 2024 | Advocacy, News
Today, the short documentary film titled “Beyond Siracusa: Human Rights in Times of Public Health Emergencies,” will be launched. The film looks at the 2023 Principles and Guidelines on Human Rights Public Health (PHE Principles), developed by experts through a process led by the International Commission of Jurists and the Global Health Consortium (GHLC). The film looks at the underlying motivation for the PHE Principles, including the imperatives for action compelled by the onslaught of the COVID 19 Pandemic, as well as the drafting process itself.
VIDEO: Beyond Siracusa: Human Rights in Times of Public Health Emergencies
“One of the important lessons learned from the COVID-19 experience is that a unified, cohesive elaboration of international law and standards prescribing how States should and should not respond to pandemics was lacking and sorely needed,” said Tim Fish Hodgson, ICJ’s Senior Legal Adviser. “The 1984 Siracusa Principles, also developed by the ICJ, elaborated a framework for a human rights-compliant response to emergency measures. The PHE Principles build on Siracusa and affirm the proactive measures that are required to secure human rights in times of public health emergency.”
The Principles, which address such questions as access to vaccines, lockdowns, and fortification of public health systems to prepare for future pandemics, expressly identify a number of responsibilities of States in the context of public health emergencies, including that they act in furtherance of:
- Universal enjoyment of human rights;
- International solidarity;
- The Rule of law;
- Equality and non-discrimination;
- Human rights protection from the conduct of non-State actors;
- Transparency and access to information;
- Meaningful and effective participation; and
- Accountability and access to justice for those harmed by human rights violations and abuses.
Elaborated by international experts through a three-year consultative process, and to date endorsed by over 50 leading experts, the Principles also provide a foundation upon which further human rights standards in public health emergency prevention, preparedness, response, and recovery may emerge and evolve. In the spirit of such evolution, the ICJ co-convened a blog symposium between October and December 2023 on the Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics at Harvard Law School’s Bill of Health, which will culminate with a webinar on 18 January 2024.
“The Principles aim to be more than static guidelines. Their essence thrives through interpretation, application, and discourse among communities of scholars, advocates, practitioners and human rights defenders,” said Roojin Habibi, a law professor at the University of Ottawa and a member of GHLC. “We extend an open invitation to all interested parties to collaborate on the implementation of these Principles, from local to global settings.”
In 2024, the World Health Organization is set to continue its work in drafting a “Pandemic Treaty,” expected to culminate with the International Negotiating Body (INB) appointed by the WHO submitting its “final outcome” to the World Health Assembly in May 2024. At the same time, a process is under way to amend the 2005 International Health Regulations stemming from experiences of their (non)application during COVID-19.
“It is our hope that the content of the Principles inform all processes currently under way within the WHO to develop and consolidate international law and standards,” Fish Hodgson said. “We reiterate the consistent calls of civil society to ensure that the WHO’s processes are fully and meaningfully participatory, resulting in the development of a Pandemic Treaty and International Health Regulations that are grounded in human rights, providing States with clear guidance on their obligations,” he concluded.
Event
Register to join the webinar discussing the Principles on 18 January at 16.00 (CET) featuring Justice Zione Ntaba (Judge of the Malawian High Court), Alicia Ely Yamin (Harvard University), Paul Hunt (New Zealand Human Rights Commission), Kayum Ahmed (Human Rights Watch) and Luisa Cabal (UNAIDS) at this link.
Links
VIDEO: Beyond Siracusa: Human Rights in Times of Public Health Emergencies
PHE PRINCIPLES: ICJ & GHLC – Human Rights & Public Health Emergencies (2023). A one page overview of the Principles is available here: One Pager – Principles and Guidelines on HR & PHE.
SIRACUSA PRINCIPLES: The Siracusa Principles on the Limitation and Derogation Provisions in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (September 1984) are available here.
SYMPOSIUM: Posts from the Blog Symposium From Principles to Practice: Human Rights and Public Health Emergencies are available here.
ICJ, Amnesty International, GI-ESCR and Human Rights Watch Draft “Pandemic Treaty” fails to comply with human rights (July 2023), available here.
ICJ, Amnesty International, GI-ESCR and Human Rights Watch Joint Public Statement: The Pandemic Treaty Zero Draft Misses The Mark On Human Rights, February 2023, available here.
For more information:
Timothy Fish Hodgson timothy.hodgson@icj.org
Roojin Habibi rhabibi@uottawa.ca
Jan 15, 2024 | News
With 2023 being the deadliest year on record for Palestinians in the West Bank, the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) condemns the rampant violent attacks by Israeli settlers, almost all of which are backed or tolerated by the Israeli authorities.
“The Israeli authorities must take immediate action to bring a halt to these violent attacks, some of which have led to the forced displacement of Palestinians,” said Said Benarbia, ICJ MENA director. “Those who are responsible for the attacks must be brought to justice with criminal sanctions commensurate to the gravity of the offences.”
Such incidents have dramatically escalated since the renewal of hostilities on 7 October, when Hamas launched unlawful attacks against Israeli civilians, which led to an indiscriminate and disproportionate response by Israeli forces in Gaza. Between 7 October and 27 December 2023, settler attacks against Palestinians in the West Bank led to the killing of at least seven adults and one child. The perpetrators have thus far enjoyed near complete impunity for the apparently unlawful killing and injury of Palestinians, with only two settlers arrested in relation to the attacks and no indictments filed.
Under international humanitarian law and human rights law, Israel, as the occupying power, has an obligation to ensure the safety and protection of the population of the West Bank and the rest of the Occupied Palestinian Territory. Moreover, under human rights law, including under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Israel has an obligation to protect the population against human rights violations, including their rights to life and security of person, and to prevent such violations, in particular by addressing incitement to hostility or violence.
OHCHR reported that between 7 October and 27 December 2023, Israeli settlers perpetrated at least 367 violent attacks against Palestinians, which caused the displacement of 1208 members of West Bank herding communities, including 586 children. Overall, 2023 was the deadliest year for Palestinians in the West Bank with the number of settler attacks against Palestinian civilians rising to an average of seven per day. In Zanuta village alone, armed Israeli settlers, some in Israeli Army reservist uniforms, forced 150 Palestinians from their homes. The Israeli Defence Forces have generally failed to intervene to prevent and stop violent acts against Palestinians, allowing Israeli settlers to seemingly exploit international preoccupation with events in Gaza to escalate efforts to forcibly remove Palestinians from their homes in the West Bank.
International law prohibits the forced displacement of persons lawfully present in an area by coercion or expulsion, without grounds permitted under international law. In addition, under international law, State-backed or tolerated Israeli settlers’ violence against civilian residents of the Occupied West Bank may amount to “an intentional and severe deprivation of fundamental rights contrary to international law by reason of the identity of the targeted group or collectivity.” This conduct may amount to the crimes against humanity of “deportation or forcible transfer of population” and “persecution”, respectively, if committed knowingly as part of a widespread or systematic attack against the Palestinian population.
The ICJ urges the Israeli government to take immediate and effective measures to prevent and stop settlers from perpetrating further crimes against the residents of the West Bank, to protect the civilian population from unlawful attacks, investigate all instances of settler violence and, when evidence so warrants, to bring those purportedly responsible to justice.
The ICJ also calls for the Israeli government to cease actions liable to further enable settlers to commit additional acts of unlawful violence against Palestinians, including by halting the implementation of its policy to expand settlements, the enforcement of laws facilitating the expropriation of Palestinian property by settler organizations, the unregulated supply of arms to settler communities, and official statements that risk being interpreted as calls for the eradication of Palestinian communities.
Finally, the ICJ calls on the International Criminal Court to investigate these criminal acts as potential war crimes and crimes against humanity that fall under the Rome Statute, and, where warranted, initiate prosecutions of those responsible.
Background
Israel’s establishment of settlements in Palestinian territory occupied since 1967 constitutes a flagrant violation of international humanitarian law. UN experts have also denounced the ongoing forced eviction of Palestinian families in East Jerusalem through the promulgation of discriminatory law that “helps settler organizations expropriate Palestinian properties.” International humanitarian and human rights law prohibit the unlawful seizure of private property and pillaging on occupied territory.
In February 2023, the newly formed Israeli government signed a coalition agreement that seeks to formally extend and annex settlements in the occupied West Bank, and establishes civilian administration for Israeli settlers in illegal West Bank settlements. The ICJ considers the settlement policy outlined in the coalition agreement to be manifestly unlawful under international law, paving the way for the further unlawful entrenchment of discriminatory and acquisitive Israeli practices towards Palestinian communities, while also being liable to incite further settler violence. In this regard, the UN Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices noted “a direct correlation between the policies of the Israeli government, as articulated in its coalition agreement, and Israeli practices on the ground,” noting that “settler attacks have increased on average from two a day in 2022 to three a day in 2023.”
Contact
Said Benarbia, Director, ICJ Middle East and North Africa Programme, t: +41-22-979-3800; e: said.benarbia(a)icj.org
Jan 12, 2024 | Comunicados de prensa, Noticias
La CIJ está preocupada por los intentos de actores poderosos en Guatemala, incluido el Ministerio Público, de subvertir la transferencia de la autoridad presidencial al presidente electo Bernardo Arévalo de León, quien debe asumir el cargo el 14 de enero de 2024.
La CIJ hace un llamamiento a todas las autoridades del Estado y a actores privados para que respeten el Estado de Derecho y desistan de interferir en el proceso de transición y cesen en sus esfuerzos por revocar o hacer ineficaces los resultados de las elecciones presidenciales de 2023.
“El sistema democrático en Guatemala está en juego. Es sorprendente que los ataques contra el proceso electoral provengan de representantes de instituciones del Estado que tienen el deber legal de defender la democracia y los derechos humanos”, afirmó Santiago Canton, Secretario General de la CIJ. “Miembros del Ministerio Público, el Congreso y el poder judicial han actuado en total desprecio de las obligaciones internacionales de Guatemala. En particular, el artículo 1 de la Carta Democrática Interamericana establece el derecho de los pueblos de las Américas a la democracia y el deber de los gobiernos de promover y defender la democracia”, añadió Canton.
El 20 de agosto de 2023, Bernardo Arévalo de León y Karin Herrera Aguilar, del partido “Movimiento Semilla”, fueron elegidos Presidente y Vicepresidenta, respectivamente, para el mandato presidencial 2024-2028. Su victoria fue certificada por el Tribunal Supremo Electoral de Guatemala. Antes y después de las elecciones, hubo múltiples intentos por parte del Ministerio Público y otras autoridades de perturbar el proceso electoral presidencial. El Parlamento Europeo y la Organización de Estados Americanos (OEA) han condenado y calificado algunos de estos hechos como “intentos de golpe de Estado”.
El Ministerio Público, a cargo de María Consuelo Porras Argueta, ha tenido un papel principal en estos intentos mediante el uso arbitrario de sus facultades de persecución penal. Entre otras acciones, el Ministerio Público ha abierto investigaciones penales injustificadas y espurias y ha emitido órdenes de captura y allanamiento contra magistrados y funcionarios del Tribunal Supremo Electoral, el presidente electo Arévalo, la vicepresidenta electa Herrera, miembros del partido “Movimiento Semilla”, miembros de organizaciones de la sociedad civil, académicos y estudiantes.
EL Ministerio Público también ha expresamente puesto en duda la legitimidad del proceso electoral presidencial de 2023. En una conferencia de prensa del 8 de diciembre de 2023, el jefe de la Fiscalía Especial Contra la Impunidad (FECI), José Rafael Curruchiche Cucul, afirmó que el Tribunal Supremo Electoral “se burló de los guatemaltecos” y estaba involucrado en violar la democracia del país. El Fiscal Curruchiche también afirmó que, desde el punto de vista del Ministerio Público, las elecciones de 2023 debían anularse.
Varios jueces han contribuido al uso arbitrario del derecho penal en detrimento del Estado de Derecho en Guatemala. El 8 de enero de 2024, el Juez Séptimo de Primera Instancia Penal, Fredy Raúl Orellana Letona, envió un oficio ante el Tribunal Supremo Electoral para que se ejecutara la orden de suspensión provisional de la personalidad jurídica del partido “Movimiento Semilla”. El Juez Orellana también ha ordenado que se inicie una investigación penal contra funcionarios del Tribunal Supremo Electoral.
En noviembre y diciembre de 2023, el Congreso guatemalteco y la Corte Suprema de Justicia llevaron a cabo el proceso judicial para retirar la inmunidad penal a algunos magistrados del Tribunal Supremo Electoral.
El traspaso legítimo del poder está intrínsecamente ligado al respeto del Estado de Derecho y al ejercicio de los derechos humanos y las libertades fundamentales, incluido el derecho a participar en la vida política y pública mediante el ejercicio del derecho al voto y el derecho a ser elegido. Estos derechos están garantizados por instrumentos internacionales de los que Guatemala es Estado parte, como el Pacto Internacional de Derechos Civiles y Políticos, la Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos y la Carta Democrática Interamericana. En consecuencia, la CIJ recuerda que las autoridades guatemaltecas están vinculadas por obligaciones internacionales en virtud de estos instrumentos.
La CIJ también pide a los Estados comprometidos y a la comunidad internacional que actúen para garantizar que las autoridades guatemaltecas respeten el Estado de Derecho, los derechos humanos y el sistema democrático. Si fuera necesario, los Estados miembros de la OEA deberían activar la aplicación del artículo 20 de la Carta Democrática Interamericana, en caso de que se impida que el presidente electo Arévalo asuma el cargo.
Contexto
Las elecciones presidenciales de 2023 tuvieron lugar en un contexto de impunidad generalizada por graves violaciones a los derechos humanos, denuncias confiables de cooptación de órganos judiciales, corrupción institucional generalizada y ataques contra integrantes de organizaciones de la sociedad civil y partidos políticos, según ha sido documentado por múltiples instancias, entre ellas la Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (CIDH). En el caso de las y los operadores de justicia (juezas, jueces y fiscales), el Alto Comisionado de las Naciones Unidas para los Derechos Humanos ha expresado su preocupación por “el incremento de la criminalización en contra de personas operadoras de justicia” y la “intimidación, el hostigamiento, el procesamiento y la persecución de quienes luchan por la rendición de cuentas por violaciones de derechos humanos y que trabajan en casos de corrupción”.
Ha habido numerosas acciones aparentemente dirigidas a socavar la integridad del proceso electoral presidencial por parte del Ministerio Público. Además de los hechos mencionados anteriormente, el 16 de noviembre de 2023, el Ministerio Público solicitó 31 órdenes allanamiento y 27 órdenes de aprehensión contra activistas, estudiantes, académicos, un miembro del “Movimiento Semilla” y personas defensoras de los derechos humanos. Entre los señalados, se encontraba el abogado de derechos humanos Ramón Cadena, quien había denunciado previamente irregularidades cometidas por el Ministerio Público. Los cargos estaban relacionados con la participación de estas personas en las protestas de 2022 contra la elección del rector de la Universidad de San Carlos. El mismo día, el Ministerio Público también indicó que el presidente electo Arévalo y la vicepresidenta electa Herrera participaron en las protestas “violentas” en busca de ventajas políticas. Por la supuesta participación en las protestas, el Ministerio Público anunció que solicitaría que se retirara la inmunidad al presidente electo Arévalo, a la vicepresidente electa Herrera y a otros miembros de su partido.
El 14 de diciembre de 2023, la Corte de Constitucionalidad resolvió una acción de amparo en la que exhortaba al Congreso a preservar el régimen democrático y a tomar todas las medidas para garantizar la transferencia pacífica del poder el 14 de enero de 2024. Además, la Corte previno a todas las autoridades guatemaltecas a que “actúen de conformidad con sus funciones para la efectividad y debido cumplimiento de la última etapa del proceso electoral.” El 11 de enero de 2024, la Corte de Constitucionalidad concedió un amparo provisional a favor de la vicepresidente electa Herrera. La Corte ordenó a todas las autoridades judiciales abstenerse solicitar y autorizar cualquier orden de aprehensión contra Herrera “sin haberse agotado el procedimiento establecido en la Ley en materia en Antejuicio”.
La situación electoral de 2023 ha sido objeto de grave preocupación de instancias internacionales, entre ellas la Unión Europea y la Organización de Estados Americanos. En esa misma línea, la CIDH otorgó medidas cautelares a favor de Arévalo y Herrera el 24 de agosto de 2023. Las medidas cautelares consideraron las alegaciones de Arévalo sobre amenazas de muerte, hostigamiento, una campaña de desprestigio y vigilancia ilegal en su contra.
El 11 de diciembre de 2023, la CIDH adoptó la “Resolución 03/2023, Derechos Humanos, la Instrumentalización del Sistema de Justicia y los Graves Riesgos para el Estado de Derecho en Guatemala”. La CIDH afirmó que Guatemala atravesaba una “grave crisis política e institucional” debido a “las acciones e injerencias indebidas y arbitrarias por parte del Ministerio Público que atentan contra el resultado de las Elecciones Generales y el proceso de transición de la Presidencia y Vicepresidencia de la República en curso”.
