EU: roundtable discussion among judges and lawyers on the application of counter-terrorism legislation

EU: roundtable discussion among judges and lawyers on the application of counter-terrorism legislation

On 18 October, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Juezas y Jueces para la Democracia and the ICJ held a a closed-door roundtable discussion in Madrid on the impact of the application of counter terrorism legislation on freedom of expression and association: implementing the EU Directive 2017/541 on combating terrorism.

The discussion took place in the framework of the EU funded project “Judges Uniting to Stop Terrorism with International, Constitutional and European law (JUSTICE) project”.

Judges, prosecutors and lawyers from 10 EU countries shared their practices and experiences in the implementation of the EU Directive 2017/541 on combating terrorism and the application of counter-terrorism legislation and its impact on freedom of expression and association, including humanitarian work within the different legal systems of the European Union (EU) Member States.

The discussion covered the offences of glorification of terrorism and apology for terrorism and its different implementation in various jurisdictions and how legal certainty and proportionality can be ensured. The roundtable further focused on the freedom of expression on-line and the impact of the application of counter-terrorism law on freedom of association and legitimate activities, including humanitarian assistance. These practices were be assessed in light of international human rights law principles in order to identify best practices that could be promoted throughout the EU.

This was a third out of four round-tables organized within this project between April and November 2019 by the ICJ and partners.

See the agenda here.

Salle comble pour le premier gala de soutien de l’ICJ – vidéo

Salle comble pour le premier gala de soutien de l’ICJ – vidéo

Le tout premier gala de soutien de l’ICJ s’est déroulé le 14 octobre dans l’enceinte du superbe Palais Eynard à Genève.

Après un accueil chaleureux de M. Sami Kanaan de la Ville de Genève, généreux sponsor de la soirée, soulignant l’importance de la coopération de l’ICJ avec la communauté juridique locale, la soirée a tenté de répondre au thème de celle-ci, devant un public nombreux: ‘ Genève, la défense de l’Etat de Droit: que puis-je faire? ‘.

Pierre de Preux, ancien bâtonnier, a pris la parole pour expliquer combien il était important de soutenir l’ICJ en participant à des missions communes, comme il l’avait fait lui-même en Tunisie dans les années 1980.

Il a été suivi par les commissaires de l’ICJ, Sir Nicolas Bratza (ancien président de la CEDH), Reed Brody (chasseur de dictateurs) et la juge Martine Comte (responsable des missions de la CIJ dans les anciennes républiques soviétiques d’Asie centrale), qui tous ont donné leur point de vue personnel sur leur contribution à la défense de l’Etat de Droit.

L’échange a été suivi d’un concert magnifique des virtuoses de l’Académie Menuhin et d’un délicieux cocktail dînatoire, préparé par des Chefs réfugiés Jena Hamza (Kurde syrienne) et Sritharan Tambithurai (Sri Lanka). Une merveilleuse soirée alliant substance, beauté et amitié et qui se répétera en 2020!

Voir la vidéo (en anglais, version française à venir):

 

Syria-Turkey: end operation “Peace Spring” and ensure the protection of civilians

Syria-Turkey: end operation “Peace Spring” and ensure the protection of civilians

Today, ICJ called on Turkey to comply with its obligations under the UN Charter, international humanitarian law and international human rights law, immediately end its military operations in Syria, and protect and ensure the protection of the Syrian civilian population.

The ICJ also reiterated its call on all parties to the Syrian conflict to respect and comply with international humanitarian law and international human rights law.

On October 9, Turkey initiated operation “Peace Spring” in Rojava, the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF)-held territory in north-east Syria, with the stated aim of securing Turkey’s border, “fighting terrorism” and facilitating the return of refugees to Syria. Turkey claimed to be acting pursuant to its right to self-defence under article 51 of the UN Charter, as well as UN Security Council resolutions on the fight against terrorism.

The ICJ recalled that none of these UN Security Council resolutions authorizes the use of armed force in violation of international law, and that the UN Charter prohibits the use of armed force by States, save when authorized by the UN Security Council or in self-defence.

Use of force in self-defence is lawful only when necessary to repel an armed attack and when proportionate to such attack. Military operations failing to abide by such requirements are in breach of the UN Charter.

“Turkey’s military operations violate the UN Charter and exemplify how the banalization of the illegal use of armed force continues to erode and dismantle the very fabric of the international legal order,” said Said Benarbia, the ICJ MENA Programme Director.

He added, “Instead of standing by while international law is being violated, the UN Security Council must take swift, appropriate measures to address the situation and to restore and maintain international peace and security.”

While UN Security Council member States have failed to find an agreement on even a statement on Turkey’s military operations in Syria, Turkish military operations continue to have a devastating impact on the general population, including multiple civilian casualties, attacks against civilian objects, including medical facilities and water supplies and infrastructure, and the displacement of more than 150,000 people, mainly civilians.

Turkish forces and the Turkish-backed armed groups have allegedly been responsible for violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law. Members of one of these groups, the Ahrar Al-Sharqiya, have been accused of the extrajudicial execution of at least nine civilians, among whom is Kurdish politician and women’s rights activist Harvin Khalaf; torture and other ill-treatment; kidnapping; and looting and seizure of private property.

Turkey’s Defence Ministry said 595 “terrorists” were “neutralized” since the start of “Peace Spring.”

Under international humanitarian law, parties to an armed conflict must respect and protect the civilian population, and refrain from any direct, indiscriminate or disproportionate attack against civilians and civilian objects. International human rights law also continues to apply during the conflict.

“Turkish authorities must investigate and prosecute unlawful killings committed in the context of operation “Peace Spring,” including extrajudicial executions amounting to war crimes,” Benarbia said.

He added, “If no action is taken by these authorities, States must act, collectively and individually, to hold to account all those responsible for such crimes.”

Contact

Said Benarbia, Director of the ICJ Middle East and North Africa Programme, t: +41-22-979-3817; e: said.benarbia(a)icj.org

Syria-Turkey operations-News-Press releases-2019-ARA (Arabic version, in PDF)

Syria-Turkey operations-News-Press releases-2019-TUR (Turkish version, in PDF)

Translate »