Aug 27, 2018 | Nouvelles, Plaidoyer
Aujourd’hui, la CIJ a publié une note d’information juridique sous la forme d’un questions-réponses (uniquement disponible en anglais) dans laquelle elle énonce ce qui est requis pour pouvoir prouver un génocide, et en particulier, l’élément d’«intention génocidaire».
La note d’information de la CIJ sort au moment où la Mission internationale indépendante d’établissement des faits au Myanmar (FFM) appelle à enquêter les crimes commis au regard du droit international, y compris le génocide.
Le génocide est un crime particulièrement odieux dont la genèse en tant que crime de droit international réside dans la politique d’extermination du régime nazi pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale.
En vertu du droit international coutumier et de la Convention pour la prévention et la répression du crime de génocide de 1948 («convention sur le génocide»), tous les États ont le devoir de prévenir et de punir le génocide.
Les agences des Nations Unies et des experts indépendants ont rapporté des informations crédibles et cohérentes selon lesquelles des crimes graves en vertu du droit national et international ont été commis contre les musulmans Rohingya au Myanmar, y compris les crimes contre l’humanité de déportation, viol et meurtre.
Un certain nombre d’experts et d’autorités ont également suggéré qu’un génocide avait été commis et ont demandé des enquêtes à ce sujet.
Aujourd’hui, la FFM a demandé l’ouverture d’une enquête sur un génocide dans le nord de l’État de Rakhine, ainsi que sur des crimes contre l’humanité et des crimes de guerre dans les États de Rakhine, Kachin et Shan.
Cette annonce fait suite à la déclaration du Haut-Commissaire des Nations Unies aux droits de l’Homme, Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein, en décembre 2017, selon laquelle “des éléments de génocide pourraient exister”.
Et en mars 2018, le Rapporteur spécial des Nations Unies sur la situation des droits de l’Homme au Myanmar, Yanghee Lee, et le Conseiller spécial des Nations Unies pour la prévention du génocide, Adama Dieng, ont évoqué la possibilité que le traitement des Rohingyas par le Myanmar puisse constituer un génocide.
Les Rohingyas constituent la grande majorité des plus de 700’000 personnes déplacées à la suite d’opérations de sécurité commandées par l’armée du Myanmar dans le nord de l’État de Rakhine, à la suite d’attaques perpétrées le 25 août 2017 par l’Armée Arakan Rohingya (ARSA).
Le génocide est un crime complexe qui, dans de nombreux cas, peut être difficile à établir au-delà du doute raisonnable dans un procès.
L’un des domaines qui s’est révélé particulièrement difficile est la nécessité de prouver «une intention spéciale» ou une «intention génocidaire», qui est un élément constitutif et distinctif essentiel du crime de génocide.
La note d’information juridique devrait aider ceux qui examinent si un génocide a été commis contre la population Rohingya et, dans l’affirmative, si quelqu’un peut être tenu individuellement pénalement responsable.
La note d’information juridique répond aux questions suivantes:
1. Quelle est la définition du génocide?
2. Que signifie légalement une “intention génocidaire”?
3. Quelles sont les similitudes et les différences entre les crimes relevant du droit international en matière de persécution et de génocide?
4. Comment les différentes juridictions ont-elles abordé les intentions génocidaires de manière factuelle?
5. Dans quelle mesure l’élément d’intention des crimes sous-jacents contre l’humanité en matière de de déportation ou de transfert forcé à l’intention génocidaire est-il pertinent?
Contact
Kingsley Abbott, ICJ Senior Legal Adviser, t: +66 (0)94 470 1345 ; e: kingsley.abbott(a)icj.org
Download
Universal-Genocide Q & A FINAL-Advocacy-analysis brief-2018-ENG (PDF en anglais)
Aug 27, 2018 | News
The ICJ today joined other International Non-Government Organizations operating in Myanmar in a statement marking one year since the commencement of military ‘clearance operations’ that caused the exodus of around 700,000 Rohingyas into neighbouring Bangladesh.
The statement reads:
As the UN Security Council meets in New York to mark one year since nearly 700,000 Rohingya refugees fled to neighboring Bangladesh, International Non-Governmental Organizations (INGOs) working in Myanmar say 600,000 Rohingya still left in Myanmar face daily discrimination and human rights abuses, making conditions unsafe for refugees to return.
INGOs urge the Security Council to use the one-year anniversary as an opportunity to step up pressure on the government of Myanmar to take action on three critical areas: addressing the root causes of the crisis in Rakhine State; ensuring accountability for human rights violations and improving humanitarian access.
Discriminatory policies mean that Rohingya communities in Rakhine State continue to lack citizenship and face restrictions on their freedom of movement, impeding their ability to go to school, seek medical care, find jobs or visit friends and family.
128,000 Rohingya and other Muslim communities remain trapped in closed camps in central Rakhine for the sixth year since the intercommunal violence of 2012.
Although some steps have been taken to relocate camp residents to new sites, the displaced communities have not been adequately consulted, are unable to return to their original homes, or another location of their choice, and continue to lack freedom of movement, access to jobs and services, thus further entrenching their confinement and segregation.
At the same time, a full and independent international investigation into human rights violations – sexual violence, killings, beatings and destruction of homes and properties – that caused refugees to flee has not happened and the perpetrators who facilitated these abuses have not been brought to justice.
The rights violations committed in Rakhine State are part of a pattern of ongoing military abuses against ethnic minorities throughout Myanmar, including in Kachin State, Shan State and the southeast of the country.
Humanitarian organizations working throughout Rakhine State continue to face serious restrictions on their access to affected communities and bureaucratic and administrative barriers hamper their ability to carry out their daily work.
In northern Rakhine, from where the majority of refugees in Bangladesh fled, full humanitarian access for most organizations has not been restored more than one year since restrictions were first put in place.
Although a Memorandum of Understanding was signed between UNHCR, UNDP and the Government of Myanmar in June with a view to enabling both agencies to resume operations in northern Rakhine, they still await full, unfettered access, and have not yet been able to begin the work of supporting affected communities and monitoring conditions.
The recommendations of the Kofi Annan-led Advisory Commission on Rakhine, published one year ago, provide the best roadmap for addressing the root causes of the crisis in Rakhine State, improving the lives of all communities and creating the conditions for an inclusive, fair and prosperous society for all the people in Rakhine.
INGOs welcome the progress made by the Government of Myanmar in implementing some of the recommendations, including those related to improving development and infrastructure, such as building new roads, schools, and hospitals, but conclude that not enough progress has been made in addressing structural human rights issues or in creating an environment where all communities can benefit from these developments without discrimination.
Without citizenship rights and freedom of movement, Rohingya communities in Rakhine State cannot equally benefit from improved development and refugees in Bangladesh will not feel safe to return.
INGOs call on the UN Security Council to set time-bound and measurable targets for the Government of Myanmar to make meaningful progress in all three of these areas and to hold regular public meetings on the crisis.
Specifically, the Security Council should call on the Government of Myanmar to implement the recommendations of the Advisory Commission in their entirety, including addressing structural problems of discrimination, restrictions on movement and denial of citizenship faced by Rohingya communities.
Implementation of the Advisory Commission recommendations also requires listening to the perspectives of all ethnic groups in Rakhine in an effort to break down the divisions that have pitted communities against each other.
Second, the Security Council should request the government of Myanmar to grant full and unfettered access for humanitarian organizations to all parts of Rakhine State as well as full access for independent media and journalists.
And finally, it should step up efforts with the government of Myanmar to allow independent human rights investigators full and unimpeded access to investigate human rights abuses, gather untampered evidence and refer cases to an international tribunal.
The Security Council must send a strong message to the Government of Myanmar to end impunity and prevent future violations.
Unless these measures are implemented, the international community risks perpetuating impunity and cementing segregation in Rakhine State for decades to come.
Myanmar-RohingyaJointNGOstatement-News-webstory-2018-ENG (full story in PDF)
Aug 24, 2018 | Новости, Событие, Статьи
Международная комиссия юристов (МКЮ) совместно с Ташкентским государственным юридическим университетом (ТГЮУ) начинает «Экспертные дискуссии по экономическим, социальным и культурным правам».
В рамках дискуссий, МКЮ и ТГЮИ приглашают всех желающих подготовить и представить доклады (статьи) на рассмотрение рабочей группой для включения в список докладчиков и последующей их презентации, и обсуждения на первой экспертной встрече.
Первая встреча пройдет «18» сентября 2018 года в ТГЮУ. Темой первой встречи является «Право на труд» и принять участие в экспертной встрече могут все желающие, включая студентов и специалистов, интересующихся данной тематикой. Для регистрации просим пройти по следующей ссылке: https://goo.gl/forms/4WRTdugLuFI6l7Hu1. Регистрация открыта до «14 сентября» 2018 года.
Uzbekistan-ESCR Call for papers_ACCESS-News-web story-2018-RUS
Aug 23, 2018 | News
The Regional Federal Tribunal (TRF-3), in a watershed judgment, ruled that prescription or statute of limitations was not applicable to claims of reparation by a victim of torture during the military regime in the 1970s. The Court accepted the arguments of ICJ Commissioner Belisário dos Santos Jr.
The hearing in the lawsuit against the Union and the State of São Paulo took place on Wednesday 22, after the case had been dismissed by the court first instance.
Belisário dos Santos Jr., Executive Committee Member of the ICJ, argued the case for the victim at the invitation of the Juridical Department of CA XI.
He noted: “On the one hand there could be no statute of limitation on torture claims, while on the other hand the the application of the statute of limitations which adopted by Decree 20.910 / 32 had to be considered.”
The lawsuit, which began in 2012, alleges political persecution and torture that took place beginning 1971 .
Belisário dos Santos Jr. argued that the rationale for the law and jurisprudence affirming the inapplicability of statute of limitation lies in the seriousness of the violation of torture, which had been committed on a widespread and systematic basis by order or with the knowledge of high-level State authorities in Brazil at the time.
“The obligation to provide reparation under the UN Convention against Torture could not be superseded by provisions of the domestic law of a State. In addition, the obligation to provide a remedy and reparation is a legal duty of the State which must not depend on the conduct or activity of the victims. For these reasons, the case could not have the same treatment of other lawsuits against the Public Treasury,” he said.
Belisário dos Santos Jr. also pointed out that, pursuant to article 14 of the UN Convention against Torture, which was ratified by Brazil in 1991, “the reparation must be fair and adequate, as recognized by the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Justice and TRF 3, itself in accordance with international human rights law and jurisprudence. ”
The TRF-3 decided by 3-2 majority that the statute of limitation was inapplicable and, unanimously, granted the appeal on merit, allowing the lawsuit to proceed.
Aug 23, 2018 | News
On 22 August, the ICJ co-organized a preparatory discussion in Bangkok for civil society organizations on Thailand’s National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights (NAP).
This event was organized one day in preparation for a formal NGO consultation event on the NAP held today.
The formal NGO consultation event was organized by the National Human Rights Commission of Thailand (NHRCT) to consider the draft NAP released by Thailand’s Ministry of Justice’s Rights and Liberties Protection Department (RLPD) in August 2018.
The ICJ hosted the preparatory discussion jointly with Community Resource Centre Foundation (CRC), Amnesty International Thailand (AI Thailand), Protection International (PI), Fortify Rights and the United Nations’ Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR).
Thirty members of civil society organizations from all across Thailand attended the preparatory discussion.
Of these participants, four persons from the North of Thailand were supported by the ICJ to attend the discussion, including Ms. Arisara Lekkam, Lecturer of Law at Mae Fah Luang University in Chiang Rai, who was also a speaker at the event.
The event began with a presentation about the NAP and business and human rights issues in Thailand, during which Arisara Lekkam provided an overview of the business and human rights situation in Thailand.
Following the presentation, participants divided into groups to discuss four prioritized areas covered by the NAP: Labour, Land and Natural Resources, Human Rights Defenders and Cross-Border Investment.
At the end of the discussion, each group presented a set of recommendations on the draft NAP pertaining to each prioritized area. These recommendations will be provided to the Ministry of Justice’s RLPD.
This is the third event the ICJ has held on business and human rights in collaboration with partners from the North of Thailand.
On 22 November 2017, the ICJ, in collaboration with Chiang Mai University’s Faculty of Law, held a roundtable discussion on human rights litigation concerning special economic zones in Myanmar and Thailand.
Between 29 and 31 July 2017, the ICJ, in collaboration with Chiang Mai University’s Faculty of Law, held a workshop on ‘Introduction to Business and Human Rights & Basic Principles on Documenting Human Rights Violations” for 25 academics, NGO representatives and lawyers in Chiang Mai.
Background
During the second Universal Periodic Review of Thailand in May 2016, the Royal Thai Government accepted a recommendation to develop, enact and implement a national action plan on business and human rights in order to implement the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
In August 2018, Thailand’s Ministry of Justice’s RLPD, which is currently leading the development of the NAP, released a revised ‘zero draft’ of the NAP.
In line with the release of the revised ‘zero draft’, the NHRCT led the organization of a formal NGO consultation event on 23 August 2018, jointly with Thailand’s Ministry of Justice, Thailand’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and OHCHR.
The Royal Thai Government reportedly plans to launch the NAP in September 2018.
