Venezuela: Systematic failure by the Prosecution Office to tackle gross human rights violations brings about near total-impunity
In a report released today, the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) evaluates the failure of Venezuela’s Public Prosecutor’s Office to address cases involving gross human rights violations amounting crimes under international criminal law. The report concludes...
Tunisia: Authorities must end Attacks on Judges and Prosecutors
In a briefing paper published today, the ICJ called on the Tunisian authorities to immediately end their attacks on independent judges and prosecutors, drop any criminal charges against them, and reinstate all those arbitrarily dismissed.
On 1 June 2022, President Kais Saied granted himself, via decree, absolute power to fire judges and prosecutors summarily, and [on the same day] promptly dismissed 57 of them. The President had earlier pledged to “cleanse” the judiciary on spurious accusations of widespread political bias and corruption.
The ICJ analysis of the cases of 18 dismissed judges and prosecutors, as well of another judge subjected to disciplinary and criminal proceedings, establishes a pattern of arbitrary disciplinary and criminal processes effectively aimed at purging the judiciary of those who asserted their independence and challenged the dismantling of the institutional independence of the judiciary.
“The ongoing arbitrary criminal prosecutions against independent judges and prosecutors for the legitimate exercise of their professional functions or of their right to freedom of expression is an affront to the rule of law and judicial independence in Tunisia,” said Said Benarbia, ICJ MENA director. “The authorities must immediately end such prosecutions and reinstate all judges and prosecutors who have been dismissed without legitimate grounds or due process”
In the aftermath of his speech on 25 July 2021 announcing exceptional measures, the President promised to “cleanse” and “purify” the judiciary, which he accused of complicity with political parties in power before July 2021, as well as of inefficiency, corruption and political bias. He also targeted the High Judicial Council and its members, limiting certain of their financial benefits. Since then, the President has followed up on his rhetoric with successive decisions and measures aimed directly at dismantling the judiciary’s institutional independence.
The ICJ’s analysis examines the process of arbitrarily dismissing and prosecuting judges and prosecutors in Tunisia since the adoption of these measures in light of the country’s obligations under international human rights law.
The ICJ’s analysis is primarily based on: (i) a review of 20 criminal cases opened by the authorities against 18 dismissed magistrates and of the case of Anas Hmedi, the President of the Association of Tunisian Magistrates (AMT), which is directly linked to his support of the dismissed judges and proseuctors; (ii) 15 interviews with judges, prosecutors and their lawyers; (iii) an analysis of the First President of the Administrative Court’s decisions to suspend the dismissal of 49 magistrates and to dismiss the request for suspension of seven others; and (iv) an analysis of decisions and reports by the General Inspection Service, the High Judicial Council and the Temporary High Judicial Council.
The ICJ considers that the conduct of the dismissed judges and prosecutors, on the basis of which they have apparently been subject to criminal proceedings, did not amount to recognizably criminal offences under general principles of criminal law and international human rights law and standards.
On the contrary, the ICJ’s analysis of these cases establishes that these judges and prosecutors were arbitrarily dismissed and then subject to criminal proceedings in relation to serious offences solely for three types of conduct, none of which is a legitimate basis for criminal prosecution:
- for the exercise of their prosecutorial and judicial functions in compliance with the law and ethical standards, and
- for the exercise of human rights protected by international human rights law, including the rights to freedom of expression and freedom of association
- for private conduct, unrelated to their performance of their duties, which, in any event, was not criminal in nature.
Contact
Said Benarbia, Director, ICJ Middle East and North Africa Programme, t: +41-22-979-3800; e: said.benarbia(a)icj.org
Download:
Download ICJ briefing on Attacks on Judges and Prosecutors in Tunisia in English: Here
Download ICJ briefing on Attacks on Judges and Prosecutors in Tunisia in Arabic: Here
EU: NGOs call on the EU Council to defend EU values in Hungary and Poland in the Article 7 procedure
Today, the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) and partners have called on the EU General Affairs Council to make full use of procedure under Article 7.1 in addressing concerns about Hungary and Poland. They advocate for strong stance in defending EU values.
The International Commission of Jurists, Amnesty International , Human Rights Watch, International Federation of Human Rights, Open Society Foundations, Reclaim, Reporters Without Borders and Transparency International EU are sharing specific points in their letter this time especially on Hungary, expressing a regret that a state of play is being organized instead of a hearing and highlighting some serious recent shortcomings.
Read the full letter here.
Libya: New Q&A on current attacks on the right to freedom of association
A new question-and-answer briefing by the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) examines recent developments that have detrimentally affected the right to freedom of association in Libya against the backdrop of an increasing crackdown on Civil Society Organizations (CSOs). Among such negative developments, the authorities have even begun enforcing repressive Gadhafi-era legislation, namely, Law No. 19 of 2001, which had not been enforced since the 2011 uprising.
.هذا البيان الصحفي متوفر باللغة العربية أيضاً
Said Benarbia, ICJ Middle East and North Africa Programme Director, said:
“Instead of subjecting them to the ongoing, relentless crackdown, Libyan authorities must ensure that independent CSOs be able to discharge their functions in defence of the rule of law and human rights independently, without political interference, undue restrictions, harassment, fear of intimidation or reprisal.”
The briefing analyzes the country’s legal framework and its compliance with domestic and international human rights law and standards. It answers the following questions:
- How has the legal framework regulating the right to freedom of association in Libya become more restrictive recently?
- Does the legal framework currently enforced by the Libyan authorities meet domestic and international human rights law and standards on the right to freedom of association?
- What are the impacts of the increasing restrictions on freedom of association on the rule of law and human rights?
Based on the analysis featured in the Q&A and with a view to ensuring full compliance with Libya’s obligations under international human rights law and relevant standards, the ICJ calls on the Libyan authorities to ensure that:
- All existing laws and decrees on CSOs be abolished, and new ones be adopted in accordance with Libya’s obligations under international human rights law and standards. Until then, the authorities shall ensure that any frameworks by the Government of National Unity or the Government of National Stability on the registration, functioning and funding of CSOs be fully in line with articles 14 and 15 of the 2011 Constitutional Declaration;
- CSOs be able to effectively play their watchdog role and act in defence of the rule of law and human rights, without political interference, intimidation, harassment or undue restrictions;
- All ongoing prosecutions and other arbitrary proceedings against civil society actors in relation to their legitimate work be terminated, and all those arbitrarily detained solely for their civil society work be immediately and unconditionally released;
- Accountability for human rights abuses to which civil society actors have been subjected; and
- CSOs be meaningfully consulted on and able to provide inputs in ongoing political processes, including those related to constitutional, electoral and transitional justice reforms.
Contact
Said Benarbia, Director, ICJ Middle East and North Africa Programme; t: +41 22 979 3817, e: said.benarbia(a)icj.org.
Mohamed Hanafy, Legal Researcher, ICJ Middle East and North Africa Programme; e: mh(a)icj.org.
Juliette Rémond Tiedrez, Legal Researcher, ICJ Middle East and North Africa Programme; e: juliette.remond-tiedrez(a)icj.org.
Download
Q&A on the current attacks on the right to freedom of association in English and Arabic.
Recent News
Civil Society Statement Ahead of Cour de Cassation Hearing on Immunities for State Officials in the Case of Bashar al-Assad03 Jul 2025
Palestine/Israel: Israel must immediately stop its criminal forcible displacement in Gaza30 Jun 2025
ICJ Submission on draft General Comment No. 27 on Children’s access to justice and effective remedy30 Jun 2025
HRC59: ICJ Statement in the interactive dialogue on the High Commissioner’s report on Venezuela – addressing arbitrary detention and repression of civic space27 Jun 2025