Martin Ennals Award 2015: the final selection is known

Martin Ennals Award 2015: the final selection is known

The three final human rights defenders who will compete for the award are Ahmed Mansoor (United Arab Emirates), Robert Sann Aung (Myanmar) and Asmaou Diallo (Guinea). The ICJ is member of the MEA Jury.

The Martin Ennals Award for Human Rights Defenders (MEA) is the main award of the human rights movement and as such can be labelled as the Nobel Price for human rights.

It is a unique collaboration among ten of the world’s leading human rights organizations to give protection to human rights defenders worldwide.

This award is selected by the International Human Rights Community (members of the jury are ICJ, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Human Rights First, International Federation for Human Rights, World Organisation Against Torture, Front Line Defenders, EWDE Germany, International Service for Human Rights and HURIDOCS).

It is given to Human Rights Defenders who have shown deep commitment and face great personal risk. The aim of the award is to highlight their work and protect them through increased visibility.

The 2015 Award will be presented on Oct. 6th at a ceremony hosted by the City of Geneva.

Since 2006, Ahmed Mansoor (United Arab Emirates) has focussed on initiatives concerning freedom of expression, civil and political rights.

He successfully campaigned in 2006-2007 to support two people jailed for critical social comments. They were released and the charges dropped.

Shortly after, the Prime Minister of UAE issued an order not to jail journalists in relation to their work.

He is one of the few voices within the United Arab Emirates who provides a credible independent assessment of human rights developments.

He regularly raises concerns on arbitrary detention, torture, international standards for fair trials, non-independence of the judiciary, and domestic laws that violate international law.

He was jailed in 2011 and since then has been denied a passport and banned from travelling.

“I’m very pleased to be nominated for the Martin Ennals award,” he said. “This recognition indicates that we are not left alone in this part of the world and I hope it will shed further light on the human rights issues in the UAE. It is not just full of skyscrapers, big malls and an area attractive to businesses, but there are other struggles of different sorts beneath all of that.”

Since his first year of University in 1974, Robert Sann Aung (Myanmar) has courageously fought against human rights abuses.

He has been repeatedly imprisoned in harsh conditions, physically attacked as well as regularly threatened.

His education was interrupted numerous times and he was disbarred from 1993 – 2012.

In 2012, he managed to regain his license to practice law. Since then he has represented jailed child soldiers, those protesting at a contested copper mine, peaceful political protesters, those whose land has been confiscated by the military, as well as student activists.

Throughout his career he has provided legal services, or just advice, often pro bono, to those whose rights have been affected.

“I feel humble and extremely honored to be nominated for this prestigious award. This nomination conveys the message to activists, human rights defenders and promoters who fight for equality, justice and democracy in Myanmar that their efforts are not forgotten by the world,” he said.

Asmaou Diallo (Guinea)’s human rights work started following the events of 28 September 2009 when the Guinean military attacked peaceful demonstrators.

Over 150 were killed, including her son, and over 100 women raped. Hundreds more were injured.

She and l’Association des Parents et Amis des Victimes du 28 septembre 2009 (APIVA), which she founded, work to obtain justice for these crimes and to provide medical and vocational support to victims of sexual assault, many of whom cannot return to their homes.

She has worked to encourage witnesses to come forward and supported them as they provided information and testimony to court proceedings.

As a result, eleven people have been charged, including senior army officers.

“Being among the nominees for the Martin Ennals Foundation encourages me to continue my fight for the protection and promotion of human rights in Guinea. I trust that this award will have a positive effect on the legal cases concerning the events of the September 28, 2009, and will be a lever for all defenders of human rights in Guinea,” she said.

Contact:

Olivier van Bogaert, Director Media & Communications, ICJ representative in the MEA Jury, t: +41 22 979 38 08 ; e: olivier.vanbogaert(a)icj.org

Michael Khambatta, Director, Martin Ennals Foundation, t: +41 79 474 8208 ; e: khambatta(a)martinennalsaward.org

Universal-MEA Final Nominees 2015-News-Press Release-2015-ENG (Official press release in English)

Universal-MEA Final Nominees 2015-News-Press Release-2015-FRE (Official press release in French)

Universal-MEA Final Nominees 2015-News-Press Release-2015-ARA (Official press release in Arabic)

Universal-MEA Final Nominees 2015-News-Press Release-2015-BUR (Official press release in Burmese)

UAE-MEA 2015 Bio Ahmed Mansoor-2015-ENG (full bio in PDF)

Myanmar-MEA 2015 Bio Robert Sann Aung-2015-ENG (full bio in PDF)

Guinea-MEA 2015 Bio Asmaou Diallo-2015-ENG (full bio in PDF)

ICJ addresses harmful gender stereotypes and assumptions

ICJ addresses harmful gender stereotypes and assumptions

Today the ICJ published a briefing paper addressing harmful gender stereotypes and assumptions in law and practice and highlighting efforts in a number of countries to reform such law and practice.

The briefing paper is intended to assist legal practitioners and human rights defenders working to ensure effective criminal justice response to sexual violence against women.

“Around the world harmful stereotypes have the effect of denying many victims of sexual violence effective access to justice and redress for violations. This briefing paper demonstrates the onerous and unfair burdens placed upon victims arising from their gender when they seek to access justice,” said Ian Seiderman, ICJ Legal and Policy Director.

The paper highlights the importance of upholding a suspect’s right to a fair trial, including the presumption of evidence and rights to examine witnesses and challenge evidence while at the same time ensuring victims and witnesses also maintain equality before the law.

The publication addresses common assumptions that women are inherently untruthful; that credibility is premised on chastity; that women will fight back and therefore should demonstrate evidence of physical force or a struggle; that women’s passive sexuality opens up room for debate in defining consent; that women should obey their husbands; and that sexual violence is a matter of dishonor to the victims and their families.

In identifying these underlying harmful gender stereotypes and assumptions the paper also identifies a number of reform measures and examples of good legislative practice that can help states to enhance protection against sexual violence of women in accordance with their international obligations.

Download the report here:

Universal-GenderStereotypes-Publications-Thematic report-2015-ENG (full text in PDF)

 

Submission on comprehensive sexuality education to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child

Submission on comprehensive sexuality education to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child

On 1 April 2015, the ICJ made a submission to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child in response to the Committee’s initial call for comments on its project of elaboration of a General Comment on the rights of adolescents under the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.

The ICJ’s submission focuses on adolescents’ right to comprehensive sexuality education, as a human right with specific relevance to the respect, protection and realization of the rights of adolescents under the Convention.

Global-Submission CRC GC right of adolescents -LegalAdvocacy-2015-ENG

Right to Privacy: Human Rights Council creates UN Special Rapporteur

Right to Privacy: Human Rights Council creates UN Special Rapporteur

The UN Human Rights Council today adopted a landmark resolution on “the right to privacy in the digital age” that will establish for the first time a UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Privacy.The resolution faced some challenges during negotiations, but was adopted without a vote (i.e. by consensus).

The Rapporteur will be appointed later this year. The Council has invited him or her to include in initial reports to the Council and UN General Assembly, a focus on the challenges to the right of privacy arising from developments in digital and communications technology in “the digital age”. However, the mandate is able to deal with all aspects of the right to privacy.

The initiative has been strongly supported by civil society organisations including the ICJ, including in the form of a joint open letter, and a joint oral statement on behalf of some 92 NGOs from around the world.

The draft resolution, as adopted, may be downloaded here: HRC28-Privacy-DraftRes-2015

Nueva Guía para profesionales (No. 9): “Desaparición forzada y ejecución extrajudicial: Investigación y sanción”

Nueva Guía para profesionales (No. 9): “Desaparición forzada y ejecución extrajudicial: Investigación y sanción”

El 13 y 14 de marzo, en Lima y Ayacucho (Perú), la CIJ y el Equipo Peruano de Antropología Forense (EPAF) realizaron dos seminarios sobre los crímenes de desaparición forzada y de ejecución extrajudicial.

Con ocasión a estos Seminarios la CIJ hizo el lanzamiento de su nueva Guía para profesionales No. 9 Desaparición forzada y ejecución extrajudicial: Investigación y sanción.

Ambos Seminarios abordaron, desde la perspectiva del Derecho internacional y de experiencias comparadas, diferentes aspectos de la investigación y sanción de los crímenes de desaparición forzada y de ejecución extrajudicial, con especial énfasis en el papel de la antropología forenses y demás disciplinas científicas en la investigación de estos crímenes y en la búsqueda e identificación de las víctimas y localización y restitución de sus cuerpos.

En Lima, el Seminario contó con la participación de César Landa (Comisionado peruano de la CIJ), Wilder Tayler (Secretario General de la CIJ), Gisela Ortiz (Directora de operaciones del EPAF) Diana Ramírez (Instituto Nacional de Medicina Legal y Ciencias Forenses de Colombia), Oscar Loyola (EPAF), Gloria Cano (APRODEH), Carlos Rivera (Instituto de Defensa Legal), Ronald Gamarra (Abogado de la CIJ) y Federico Andreu (Representante para Suramérica de la CIJ). El Seminario de Ayacucho contó con la participación de José Pablo Baraybar (Director del EPAF), Gisela Ortiz, Diana Ramírez, José Suasnavar (Fundación de Antropología Forense de Guatemala), Ronald Gamarra y Federico Andreu.

A ambos eventos asistieron, entre otros, magistrados, jueces, fiscales, representantes del Instituto de Medicina Legal de Perú y de la Defensoría del Pueblo, miembros de las organizaciones no gubernamentales de derechos humanos y de asociaciones de víctimas, autoridades locales, representantes de la comunidad diplomática y periodistas.

Universal-Desaparición forzada y ejecución extrajudicial PG9-Publications-Practitioners’ guide series-2015-SPA (informe en Español)

Universal-Enforced Disappearance and Extrajudicial Execution PGNo9-Publications-Practitioners’ guide series-2015-ENG (full report in PDF, English)

Translate »