Tunisia:  Joint communication to UN Special Procedures calls for immediate action to counter attacks against the transitional justice process

Tunisia:  Joint communication to UN Special Procedures calls for immediate action to counter attacks against the transitional justice process

In a joint communication to five United Nations Special Procedures, the ICJ and its partners urged the mandate holders to call on the Tunisian authorities to immediately stop hampering the transitional justice process.

The organizations expressed their concern at the ongoing attempts to undermine the transitional justice process and accountability efforts for past gross human rights violations.

“The Tunisian transitional justice process has been under serious attack since its inception in 2013. Today, the ICJ and its partners are urging the United Nations Special Procedures to take urgent action to deter such attacks, demand justice for the victims and secure accountability for the perpetrators,” said the Director of ICJ’s Middle East and North Africa Programme, Said Benarbia.

The joint communication highlights the following areas of concern:

  • The recent political initiatives to dismantle the transitional justice process;
  • The incessant attacks against the Truth and Dignity Commission (Instance Verité et Dignité, IVD) and its 2018 final report’s findings;
  • The lack of support to the Specialized Criminal Chambers (SCC) and the numerous obstacles that risk to severely impair access to justice and effective remedies for victims of gross human rights violations.

The communication is addressed to the following United Nations Special Procedures:

  • The Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence;
  • The Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment;
  • The Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers;
  • The Working Group on Arbitrary Detention; and
  • The Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances.

The communication was submitted jointly by the ICJ along with:

  • The World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT)
  • The Ligue tunisienne des droits de l’homme (LTDH)
  • The Forum Tunisien pour les Droits Economiques et Sociaux (FTDES)
  • Avocats Sans Frontières (ASF)
  • The Association of Tunisian Magistrates (AMT)
  • Al Bawsla
  • International Alert
  • The Association KARAMA
  • The Association INSAF pour les anciens militaires
  • No Peace Without Justice
  • The Organisation Contre la Torture en Tunisie (OCTT)
  • The Organisation Dhekra we Wafa, pour le martyr de la liberté Nabil Barakati
  • The Coalition Tunisienne pour la Dignité et la Réhabilitation
  • The Association Tunisienne pour la Défense des Libertés Individuelles
  • The Association des Femmes Tunisiennes pour la Recherche sur le Développement
  • The Association Internationale pour le Soutien aux Prisonniers Politiques
  • The Réseau tunisien de la justice transitionnelle

Contact

Valentina Cadelo, Legal Adviser, ICJ Middle East and North Africa Programme, e: valentina.cadelo(a)icj.org

Asser Khattab, Research and Communications’ Officer, ICJ Middle East and North Africa Programme, e: asser.khattab(a)icj.org

Download

Tunisia-Special-Procedures-Joint-Submission-2021 (PDF, in French)

UN: Overview of the 46th Human Rights Council session

UN: Overview of the 46th Human Rights Council session

Today, at the close of the 46th regular session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, the ICJ and other NGOs highlighted key achievements and failures.

The joint civil society statement, delivered by International Service for Human Rights (ISHR) on behalf of the group, outlines the main achievements and shortfalls of this last 46th regular session.

In the statement, the undersigned organisation comment on the engagement of civil society in online sessions, welcome the adoption of the resolution on vaccines and of resolutions to sustain scrutiny and accountability including in Belarus, Iran, Myanmar, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, South Sudan and Syria. The NGOs have underlined the fact thatover 30 States have united in a long-overdue condemnation of Egypt’s misuse of counter-terrorism measures to imprison peaceful critics, and over 40 States raised concern over the shrinking civic space in Russia.

The civil society organisations have urged the Council to take prompt action on Algeria, Cameroon, China, India, and in Kashmir, and for the upcoming session, to set up an international accountability mechanism on the Philippines, and independent monitoring on pushbacks and other violations faced by migrants and refugees.

The statement is endorsed by:

  • International Service for Human Rights;
  • Franciscans International;
  • Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights (EIPR);
  • International Commission of Jurists (ICJ);
  • International Movement Against All Forms of Discrimination and Racism (IMADR);
  • Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA);
  • African Centre For Democracy And Human Rights Studies;
  • International Federation for Human Rights Leagues (FIDH);
  • MENA Rights Group;
  • International Lesbian and Gay Association;
  • Impact Iran;
  • Ensemble contre la Peine de Mort (ECPM);
  • Siamak Pourzand Foundation;
  • Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies (CIHRS);
  • ARTICLE 19;
  • CIVICUS: World Alliance for Citizen Participation.

Read the full statement: UN-JointStatement-UNHRC46-Advocacy-EndOfSession-ENG-2021

Contact:

Massimo Frigo, ICJ UN Representative, e: massimo.frigo(a)icj.org, t: +41797499949

Zimbabwe: women human rights defenders face higher risk of sexual or gender-based violence – ICJ report

Zimbabwe: women human rights defenders face higher risk of sexual or gender-based violence – ICJ report

Women human rights defenders are at a heightened risk of sexual or gender-based violence as a result of the nature of their work in defence of human rights, the ICJ  said in a new report published today.

The 28-page report Sexual and Gender-Based Violence in Zimbabwe: Women Human Rights Defenders’ Experiences and Legal Challenges concluded that gaps within the Zimbabwean legal framework on sexual offences hinder women human rights defenders from seeking and receiving redress for sexual or gender-based violence suffered in the course of or due to the nature of their work.

The report explores the main legal gaps identified and makes recommendations to a number of actors, including the Zimbabwe Republic Police, the Judicial Service Commission and Parliament of Zimbabwe.

“The police, the Judicial Service Commission, and ultimately the Parliament must improve their approach to SGBV for the benefit of all women, including women human rights defenders,” said Blessing Gorejena, ICJ Senior Legal Adviser.

In 2019, the ICJ commissioned a study of the experiences of women who are  human rights defenders in Zimbabwe based on the following research questions:

  1. Does the work of WHRDs increase their risk of being subjected to sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV)?
  2. What are the key legal challenges that WHRDs encounter when seeking redress for SGBV perpetrated against them due to or as a result of their work?

This report builds on the discussions held at a regional colloquium organized by the ICJ in 2015 in Eswatini. Those discussions were presented in a reflection paper entitled Sexual and Gender-based Violence, Fair Trial Rights and the Rights of Victims: Challenges in Using Law and Justice Systems Faced by Women Human Rights Defenders.

Contact

Blessing Gorejena, Senior Legal Adviser and Team Leader of ICJ Zimbabwe Project, e: blessing.gorejena(a)icj.org

Elizabeth Mangenje, Legal Adviser, e: elizabeth.mangenje(a)icj.org

Download

Zimbabwe-SGBV-WHRD-Publications-Reports-Thematic reports-2021-ENG

Translate »