Council of Europe: ICJ and AI third submission on draft foreign fighters protocol

Council of Europe: ICJ and AI third submission on draft foreign fighters protocol

The ICJ and Amnesty International submitted today their observations on the revised draft Additional Protocol to the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism to the Committee of Experts on Terrorism (CODEXTER).

The submission highlights key points that the two organizations set out in more detail in a previous submission to the Committee on Foreign Terrorist Fighters and Related Issues (COD-CTE) on a previous (12 March) draft of the Additional Protocol, as well as in earlier preliminary observations, and which are not reflected in the text of the draft Protocol as it presently stands. This submission also includes comments on the new Article 7 of the draft Protocol.

The ICJ and Amnesty International urged CODEXTER to consider these concerns and recommendations and to make further amendments to the text of the draft Protocol accordingly before it is submitted for adoption by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe.

CouncilofEurope-CODEXTER-DraftProtocolTerrorismConvention-ICJ-AISubmission-2015-ENG (download the last submission)

CouncilofEurope-Submission-ForeignFighters-Advocacy-Legal Submission-2015-ENG (download the second submission)

CouncilofEurope-Letter-ForeignFighters-Advocacy-Legal Submission-2015-ENG (download the first submission)

 

Submission on comprehensive sexuality education to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child

Submission on comprehensive sexuality education to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child

On 1 April 2015, the ICJ made a submission to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child in response to the Committee’s initial call for comments on its project of elaboration of a General Comment on the rights of adolescents under the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.

The ICJ’s submission focuses on adolescents’ right to comprehensive sexuality education, as a human right with specific relevance to the respect, protection and realization of the rights of adolescents under the Convention.

Global-Submission CRC GC right of adolescents -LegalAdvocacy-2015-ENG

EU: Briefing paper on proposed directive on presumption of Innocence

EU: Briefing paper on proposed directive on presumption of Innocence

The ICJ, JUSTICE and NJCM have published their analysis of the proposed EU directive on the presumption of innocence, and made recommendations for amendments, to ensure its compliance with international human rights law.

The briefing paper welcomes the aim of the initiative of the Commission’s proposed directive, to protect both the presumption of innocence and the right to be present at trial in EU law.  However, it notes there are some aspects of the Commission proposal that  should be strengthened.  The ICJ, JUSTICE and NJCM also raise concerns that some of the amendments proposed by the Council in its General Approach would unduly limit the rights guaranteed in the Directive, so that they offer less protection than that provided under international human rights law, including the ECHR, in accordance with the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. 

ICJJUSTICENJCM-Briefing-EU-PresumptionofInnocenceDirective-LegalIntervention-2015-ENG (download the legal briefing)

Joint intervention in case of immigration detention of mother and children

Joint intervention in case of immigration detention of mother and children

The ICJ, the European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE) and the AIRE Centre submitted a thirty party intervention before the European Court of Human Rights in the case of the immigration detention of a mother with her children in Poland.

The case, Dagmara Bilalova v. Poland, concerned the detention for purpose of deportation of a Russian citizen from Chechnya, Dagmara Bilalova, and her five children. According to the statement of facts of the case, Dagmara Bilalova was also allegedly subjected to domestic violence from her husband, who had been previously deported to the Russian Federation. She and her children were deported to the Russian Federation on 27 March 2014.

The three human rights organisations submitted observations on standards and principles of international and EU law regarding:

  • the requirements for the compliance of administrative detention of non-national families with children, with article 5.1 of the ECHR, and with UN treaties, standards and jurisprudence in particular relating to the Convention on the Rights of the Child;
  • the international law, standards and jurisprudence applicable to the victims of domestic violence and their administrative detention in the framework of migration law and policies;
  • EU, national and international law applicable to the identification and treatment of asylum seekers with special reception needs.

ECtHR-AmicusBrief-Bilalova v Poland-Advocacy-Legal Submission-2015-ENG (download the third party intervention)

Council of Europe: ICJ and AI observations on draft foreign fighters protocol negotiations

Council of Europe: ICJ and AI observations on draft foreign fighters protocol negotiations

The ICJ and Amnesty International have submitted public observations on the terms of reference to draft an Additional Protocol supplementing the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism.

In the letter containing their observations, the ICJ and AI outlined before the Committee on Foreign Terrorist Fighters and Related Issues (COD-CTE) of the Council of Europe the general principles of human rights law related to the issue of foreign fighters and the implementation of Security Council resolution 2178(2014) and made observations on specific acts the criminalization of which was explicitly mandated by the Committee of Ministers. The two human rights organisations expressed their concern at the lack of publicity of the negotiations and public availability of the draft protocol which impeded a punctual and effective process of consultations and observations on the negotiated text.

The letter outlines positions and concerns with relation to:

  • The lack of definition of central concepts like “terrorism”, “terrorist acts”, and “foreign fighters”
  • The risk of introducing criminal offences lacking the clarity, accessibility and foreseeability required by the principle of legality
  • The risk of conflation of of different legal regimes, notably of international humanitarian law and ordinary criminal law
  • The need to investigate and prosecute existing crimes under international law
  • The need to ensure that any criminalisation of acts or omissions must have a close connection to the commission of the principal criminal offence, with a real risk that such a principal criminal act would in fact take place
  • The proposed criminal offences of being recruited and receiving training for terrorism, and their ancillary offences.

CouncilofEurope-Letter-ForeignFighters-Advocacy-Legal Submission-2015-ENG (download the observations)

Translate »