Turkey: judicial independence and freedom of expression

Turkey: judicial independence and freedom of expression

The ICJ welcomed today the Special Rapporteur’s report on Turkey and his preliminary findings on his visit to the country last November.

The ICJ welcomes and concurs with the finding that the “situation of the judiciary is undermining freedom of opinion and expression”.

Mass dismissals of judges have had a devastating effect on the judiciary’s independence, already weakened by the current state of emergency. Furthermore, we are concerned at the claim by the President that the state of emergency will remain in place until Turkey reaches “peace and prosperity”.  Whatever other questions there may be about their validity, maintaining emergency derogations to human rights law instruments for such an open-ended period would clearly not be in line with international law.

The ICJ is also concerned at the constitutional amendments approved on the 16th of April by a referendum. Among other things, the amendments have given powers to the President and the Parliament to appoint all the members of the High Council of Judges and Prosecutors, the body tasked with protecting the independence of these professions.

The judiciary has had in the past an important role in implementing legislation that has severely limited the freedom of journalists to carry out their job.

The independence of the judiciary has now been eroded to its core in Turkey. Without it, there is no effective remedy in the country to protect freedom of opinion and expression.

Further reading: ICJ’s briefing paper Turkey: the Judicial System in Peril

Business responsibility to respect human rights:  challenges and opportunities six years after the adoption of UNGPs

Business responsibility to respect human rights: challenges and opportunities six years after the adoption of UNGPs

Today, the ICJ and FIDH are organizing a side event to to the 35th Regular session of the Human Rights Council on business and human rights.

Business responsibility to respect human rights

Challenges and opportunities six years after the adoption of UNGPs 

A dialogue to move forward

 Thursday 8 June 2017, 15.30-17.00

Meeting Room VIII

Palais des Nations, Geneva

After the adoption of the UNGP in 2011, standards on business responsibility to respect human rights and business human rights due diligence have gained prominence in the global debate on business accountability.

Many companies claim to comply with the UNGP by performing a human rights due diligence including across their global supply chain.

Several initiatives have emerged at regional and national level to promote companies’ due diligence processes, including the EU Directive on non-financial reporting, the UK Modern Slavery Act, the French law on company devoir de vigilance.

Despite the progress, serious human rights abuses still occur in both developing and developed countries.

The ability of companies to identify, monitor and prevent negative human rights impacts in their operations and relationships is still weak and the access to effective remedy remains difficult if not impossible.

This is an opportune moment to take stock of the progresses made to date and the challenges ahead in order to create a level playing field that will effectively promote the respect of human rights in business global operations.

Welcome speech

Saman Zia-Zarifi, ICJ Secretary General

Moderator

Carlos Lopez, ICJ

Panelists

Fernanda Hopenhaym, PODER/ESCR-net CAWG steering group

Maddalena Neglia, FIDH

Michael Addo, UN Working Group on BHR

Olivier De Schutter, UN Committee on ESCR/University of Louvain

Refugees & Migrants: the role of Judges & Lawyers (Panel Discussion)

Refugees & Migrants: the role of Judges & Lawyers (Panel Discussion)

The ICJ organised a panel discussion on 8 June 2017, on the role of judges and lawyers in relation to refugees and migrants, at a side event to the 35th session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva.

The Panel was held on the occasion of the publication of ICJ Principles and Commentary on the topic, developed in consultation with judges, lawyers and other expert practitioners from around the world.

The event took place on Thursday, 8 June 2017, from 10:30 to 11:30, in Room XXI of the Palais des Nations, Geneva.

Welcome remarks were delivered by:

  • Saman Zia-Zarifi, Secretary General of the ICJ.
  • Olivier Coutau, Délégué à la Genève internationale, Republic and Canton of Geneva

Panelists included:

  • François Crépeau, UN Special Rapporteur on the human rights of migrants.
  • Carole Simone Dahan, Senior Legal Advisor on Judicial Engagement, UNHCR.
  • Pia Oberoi, Advisor on Migration and Human Rights, OHCHR.

The discussion was moderated by Matt Pollard, ICJ Senior Legal Adviser.

At the event, each of the panelists emphasised the importance of access to independence courts and lawyers for securing the rights of refugees and migrants, and highlighted the importance and utlity of the ICJ Principles in this regard.

More background on the ICJ Principles and Commentary is available by clicking here.

For more information, email un(a)icj.org

A flyer for the event may be downloaded in PDF format here: Refugees-Migrants-ICJ-Event-HRC35-June2017

The consultations, development and publication of the ICJ Principles were made possible with the financial support of the Republic and Canton of Geneva, for which the ICJ is grateful.

Translate »