Dec 7, 2015 | News
The ICJ today called on the Moroccan authorities to put an immediate end to the disciplinary proceedings initiated against judges Amal Homani and Mohamed Al-Haini.
The two were referred to the High Judicial Council by the Minister of Justice on unfounded allegations of “violating the duty of discretion” and “expressing opinions of a political nature”.
The charges stem from social media comments and media articles written by the judges in which they criticized the government’s Draft Law No. 100.13 on the Conseil Supérieur du Pouvoir Judiciaire and the Draft Law No 106.13 on the Statute for Judges, including provisions that appear designed to maintain executive branch control of the judiciary and the career of judges.
“Instead of subjecting judges who are promoting the rule of law and judicial independence to unjustified and arbitrary disciplinary proceedings, the Moroccan authorities must comply with their obligations under international standards to guarantee, protect and preserve judicial independence,” said Said Benarbia, Director of the ICJ Middle East and North Africa Programme.
“The disciplinary proceedings against judges Amal Homani and Mohamed Al-Haini are clearly without foundation and must be immediately and unconditionally terminated,” he added.
International standards are clear: members of the judiciary are, like other citizens, entitled to freedom of expression, belief, association and assembly.
The exercise of these basic human rights in a manner that preserves the dignity of their office and the impartiality and independence of the judiciary should not constitute a disciplinary offence, the ICJ says.
The social media comments and media articles by judges Amal Homani and Mohamed Al-Haini were clearly within the scope of their rights to freedom of expression, the Geneva-based organization adds.
Under the current legal framework, in particular Law No.1-74-467 of 1974 on the Statute for Judges, the Ministry of Justice has comprehensive and effective control over the entire judiciary, including the High Judicial Council, the career of judges and judicial administration.
Indeed, under the current framework, the Minister of Justice is the Vice-President of the High Judicial Council.
As such the impartiality and fairness of any disciplinary hearings initiated by the Minister of Justice based on statements perceived to criticize the executive branch, must be called into question, the ICJ says.
While provisions of the 2011 Constitution relating to the judiciary constitute an important step towards ending the executive’s control over the judiciary, Moroccan professional associations of judges and civil society organizations have expressed concern that the draft laws perpetuate such control as well as executive interference in judicial matters.
The ICJ has previously called on the Moroccan authorities to revise the two flawed draft laws to ensure their full compliance with international law and standards on judicial independence.
“The Moroccan authorities must end their attacks on judicial independence, including by revising flawed institutional and legal reforms and by ending politicized proceedings against judges,” Benarbia said.
Contact:
Theo Boutruche, Legal Adviser of the ICJ Middle East and North Africa Programme, tel: +961 70 888 961, e-mail: theo.boutruche(a)icj.org
Morocco-Judges Homani-El Haini-News-Press releases-2015-ARA (full press release in PDF, Arabic)
Nov 28, 2015 | News
The ICJ co-hosted the Joint Zimbabwe Judicial-Legal Practitioners Colloquium in Zimbabwe. The meeting was held in conjunction with the Law Society of Zimbabwe (LSZ) and the Judicial Services Commission (JSC) of Zimbabwe.
The meeting took place on 27 – 28 November 2015 under the theme “Access to Justice: Barriers and Solutions (A Bar-Bench Dialogue)”.
This year it congregated 30 legal practitioners and 60 Judges who sought to have an honest discussion on the challenges that affect access to justice in Zimbabwe in an attempt to seek practical solutions to these challenges for greater access.
The Chief Justice Godfrey Chidyausiku, and the President of the Law Society Mrs Vimbai Nyemba, in their opening remarks both highlighted the importance of this dialogue platform to justice delivery in Zimbabwe.
They both noted how the colloquium has over the years contributed towards the construction of bridges between the bar and the bench and the doing away of hostilities for the betterment of Justice delivery.
Oct 15, 2015 | News
La CIJ, durante la misión de su Comisionado José Antonio Martín Pallín al país, ha constatado que la trascendencia política y social de los asuntos que el Juez Miguel Ángel Gálvez está investigando, le ha ocasionado numerosos ataques injustificados desde diversos sectores de la sociedad guatemalteca.
Además, la CIJ recibió información que las y los jueces continúan siendo amenazados en el ejercicio de su independencia por la injerencia de la Corte Suprema de Justicia en funciones administrativas, relacionadas con el control del personal, especialmente en el traslado injustificado de jueces.
El Juez Miguel Ángel Gálvez (foto) ha afrontado riesgos de traslado en los últimos 6 meses.
La CIJ concluye que la actuación del Juez se ajusta a los principios internacionalmente admitidos del derecho al debido proceso y a las garantías de las y los sindicados.
La CIJ expresa su profunda preocupación por la acumulación excesiva de asuntos judiciales sobre el Juzgado de Competencia Ampliada del juez Gálvez, que hacen absolutamente imposible una actuación dentro de los plazos exigidos por la ley.
La CIJ demanda con toda firmeza que la Corte Suprema de Justicia tome medidas efectivas de apoyo al juzgado de Mayor Riesgo B, para que éste pueda concentrarse en la tramitación de los asuntos que verdaderamente preocupan en este momento a los ciudadanos y ciudadanas guatemaltecas, como por ejemplo el llamado Caso La Línea, el caso Sepur Zarco y el caso Siekavizza, entre otros.
La CIJ considera que ningún órgano judicial puede afrontar la pesada carga judicial a la que el Juez Gálvez tiene que hacer frente; cualquier demora en la tramitación de los asuntos pendientes ante su juzgado, no debe ser atribuida al juez Gálvez, sino a la inactividad de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, que no nombra a jueces de apoyo, que permitan tramitar las causas pendientes.
Jun 19, 2015 | News
The ICJ today called on the Moroccan authorities to amend the draft laws on the High Judicial Council, the Conseil supérieur du pouvoir judiciaire (CSPJ), and on the Statute for Judges, to ensure their full compliance with international law and standards on judicial independence.
The ICJ called on the authorities to ensure that: the CSPJ is institutionally and organizationally independent; is exclusively competent to manage the career of judges, including the selection of trainee judges; is involved in determining the budget for the judiciary; and is empowered to administer the allocation of judicial resources.
This statement comes following the conclusion of a high-level mission to Morocco from 12 to 18 June 2015 to engage with members of the executive, legislative and judicial branches, as well as representatives of civil society, on the judicial reforms initiated by the Moroccan authorities.
“The Draft Law on the CSPJ should enhance and expand the guarantees of judicial independence provided for by the 2011 Constitution, including by ensuring that the General Inspection Service (GIS) is under the authority of the CSPJ, that the organic law on the CSPJ sets out the GIS composition, competencies, and areas of intervention, and that the CSPJ oversees all issues pertaining to judicial administration,” said Philippe Texier, ICJ Commissioner and a former judge of the French Cassation Court (photo).
During this mission, the ICJ submitted to the authorities two memos analyzing the draft laws in light of international law and standards and formulating recommendations for amendments and reform.
In particular, the ICJ called for the majority of the members of the CSPJ to be judges who are chosen by their peers, for the selection and appointment of the President and the General Prosecutor of the Cassation Court to be based on objective criteria and made through transparent procedures, and for the grounds and procedure for dismissal of members of the CSPJ to be prescribed by the Law.
The ICJ is also deeply concerned that the draft law on the Statute for Judges does not contain any provisions on the criteria and procedure for selecting trainee judges.
Under the current framework, the process of selecting trainee judges is under the effective control of the Ministry of Justice.
Furthermore, while the Draft Laws entrusts the CSPJ to draft a Code of Judicial Conduct, they do not specify that, once adopted, the Code should be the basis on which judges will be held to account professionally, the Geneva-based organization says.
“The Draft Law should be amended to set out fair and transparent procedures for selecting trainee judges, to ensure that the CSPJ is fully competent to oversee the entire selection process, and to provide for the code of ethics and judicial conduct to be established in the law as the basis on which judges will be held to account professionally, including by clearly and precisely defining disciplinary offences,” said Said Benarbia, ICJ Director of the Middle East and North Africa Programme.
Contact:
Theo Boutruche, Legal Adviser of the ICJ Middle East and North Africa Programme, t: +96 170 888 961, e: theo.boutruche(a)icj.org
Additional information:
The ICJ delegation was led by Mr. Philippe Texier, former judge of the French Cassation Court and ICJ Commissioner.
The delegation met with Mr. Driss Dahak, Secretary General of the Government; Mr. Abdelilah Lahkim Bennani, Secretary General of the Ministry of Justice; Mr. Mustapha Farès, First President of the Cassation Court; Mr. Mohamed Meddah, Prosecutor General of the Cassation Court; Mr. Mohamed Cheikh Biadillah, President of the Chamber of Counsellors; Mr. Omar Adkhil, President of the Commission of Justice, Legislation and Human Rights of the Chamber of Counsellors; Mr. Mohamed Zerdali, President of the Commission of Justice, Legislation and Human Rights of the Chamber of Deputies; Mr. Abdellatif Chentof, President of the Judges Club; Mr. Mohamed Khadraoui, vice-President of the Amicale Hassania; and Mr. Mohamed Akdim, President of the Bar Associations of Morocco (ABAM).
Morocco-Draft Law CSPJ-News-press releases-2015-ARA (full text of statement, in PDF, Arabic)
Morocco-Memo on the CSPJ-Advocacy-Briefing paper-2015-ENG (full text of memo 1 in PDF)
Morocco-Memo on the CSPJ-Advocacy-Briefing paper-2015-ARA (full text of memo 1 in PDF, Arabic)
Morocco-Memo on Statute for Judges-Advocacy-Briefing paper-2015-ENG (full text of memo 2 in PDF)
Morocco-Memo on Statute for Judges-Advocacy-Briefing paper-2015-ARA (full text of memo 2 in PDF, Arabic)
Jun 18, 2015 | News
Today, the ICJ expressed concern at the attempt to initiate criminal proceedings against the President of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, following interrogations of judges of the Constitutional Court and seizures of documents from the Court earlier this year.
On 16 June, the Chair of the Security Council of Ukraine, Valentin Nalivaychenko, is reported to have filed evidence alleging criminal offences by the President of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, Jury Baulin.
The documents allege that he abused his office in violation of Article 364(2) of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, leading to the usurpation of power by the former President, Victor Yanukovich.
The allegations relate to a decision of the Constitutional Court of 30 September 2010, No 20-rp/2010, which overturned the adoption of the Constitution of 2004.
The initiation of the criminal proceedings is therefore based entirely on a ruling of the Constitutional Court on a question of constitutional law.
“It is inherent in the judicial function that courts issue rulings concerning matters on which public opinion may be divided. Prosecution of judges in relation to such decisions undermines judicial independence and erodes the rule of law,” said Wilder Tayler, ICJ Secretary General. “In all times but particularly in times of transition, such as at present in Ukraine, it is crucial that the executive refrain from any interference with the independence of the judiciary”.
The ICJ stressed that such attempts to initiate criminal proceedings against the President of the Constitutional Court are contrary to international law and standards on the independence of the judiciary, including the UN Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary.
“Changes to the law or Constitution, must be sought and brought about through proper constitutional processes in the legislature and courts, not through prosecutions of judges. Criminal investigations and prosecutions against Constitutional Court judges must be discontinued and the government must ensure that the Court can operate without threats or interference,” Tayler added.
Following the change of government in early 2014, the ICJ expressed concern at the dismissals of judges of the Constitutional Court by the Verkhovna Rada (the Ukrainian Parliament) and called on the authorities to ensure the security of tenure of judges and non-interference with judicial independence.
Earlier this year, the Security Service of Ukraine interrogated sitting judges of the Constitutional Court in regard to the same case.
According to the State Security Service, at least 10 judges of the Constitutional Court have been interrogated. Moreover, the Security Service of Ukraine seized documents from the Constitutional Court in May 2015.
These investigations and prosecutions of Constitutional Court judges are taking place at a time when the Court is considering a number of highly significant cases, including the constitutionality of the Law “On cleansing of power”, the Law “On condemnation of the communist and national-socialist (nazi) regimes in Ukraine and prohibition of propaganda of their symbols” and the Law on an “All-Ukrainian referendum”.
The ICJ recalls that Article 1 of the UN Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary clarifies that all governmental and other institutions must respect and observe the independence of the judiciary.
The principles further stipulate that [t]he judiciary shall decide matters before them impartially, on the basis of facts and in accordance with the law without restrictions or improper influences, inducements, pressures threats or interferences, direct or indirect, from any quarter or for any reason” (Article 2).
Recommendation No. R(94) 12 of the Committee of Ministers to Members States on the Independence, Efficiency and Role of Judges elaborates on this principle, stipulating that “judges should have unfettered freedom to decide cases impartially, in accordance with their conscience and their interpretation of the facts, and in pursuance of the prevailing rules of the law. Judges should not be obliged to report on the merits of their cases to anyone outside the judiciary”.
Contact:
Róisín Pillay, Director, Europe Programme, e: roisin.pillay(a)icj.org
Temur Shakirov, Legal Adviser, Europe Programme, e: temur.shakirov(a)icj.org
External link: Official information about the criminal procedure
