Myanmar: ICJ attends Universal Periodic Review Pre-Session in Geneva

Myanmar: ICJ attends Universal Periodic Review Pre-Session in Geneva

Myanmar’s human rights record for the past four and a half years will be under scrutiny at the United Nations (UN) Human Rights Council (HRC), as the country goes up for its Universal Periodic Review (UPR) review on 6 November 2015.

Myanmar will be assessed on developments based on information provided by the government, UN human rights experts, institutions and treaty bodies; and stakeholders including Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs).

The eleventh round of Pre-Sessions to discuss the human rights situations in Myanmar was held on 8 October 2015 and was organized by UPR-Info.

The event brought together various permanent missions and various Myanmar civil society organizations (CSOs) that presented their respective UPR recommendations.

This event also provided NGOs, including the ICJ, with an opportunity to contribute to the UPR process by informing several delegations at once about specific, actionable recommendations to the government to effectively address human rights violations and provide redress.

In its UPR stakeholder submission, the ICJ drew the attention of the HRC Working Group on the UPR, and that of the HRC itself, to the ICJ’s concerns about the independence of the judiciary and legal profession, the lack of legislation adequately protecting human rights and the environment, discriminatory laws targeting women and minorities, and the writ of habeas corpus in Myanmar.

The Office of the Commissioner for Human Rights referred to these issues in its summary to the HRC Working group on the UPR.

UPR discussions in Geneva led by NGOs reiterated that despite reforms, significant human rights challenges remain in Myanmar. These include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • During its first UPR in 2011, Myanmar had supported recommendations to consider signing and ratifying core human rights treaties, but has made no significant progress;
  • A recent parliament veto reserves the 25% of the seats in the legislative bodies for the military, thus continuing military impunity and preserving their hold over any constitutional or legislative amendment;
  • The Myanmar National Human Rights Commission suffers from low credibility due to its lack of autonomy from the government and failure to investigate egregious human rights violations;
  • The package of “race and religion protection” laws comes at a time of increasing ethnic and religious tension, and discriminates on grounds of gender and religion. Discrimination against religious minorities has led to mass displacement, deaths and rights violations;
  • Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender rights are routinely violated;
  • The Environmental Conservation Law allowed government departments and private business abroad exemptions from environmental protection obligations;
  • Judicial independence is compromised as judges in some instances still render decisions based on orders coming from military and the government.

Contact:

Vani Sathisan, ICJ International Legal Adviser, Myanmar, t: +95-09250800301; e: vani.sathisan(a)icj.org

The ICJ’s UPR stakeholder submission for Myanmar can be found here

The OHCHR summary to the UN Working Group for the UPR can be found here

 

 

ICJ’s submission to the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Swaziland

ICJ’s submission to the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Swaziland

Today, the ICJ made a submission to the Human Rights Council’s Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review in advance of the Human Rights Council’s review of Swaziland in April/May 2016.
In its submission, the ICJ expressed concern about the following issues:

1) independence and impartiality of the judiciary and fair trial rights; and

2) international human rights instruments and mechanisms.

A copy of the submission can be found here:

Swaziland-ICJ-UPR-SWAZI SUBMISSION FINAL AS LODGED-Advocacy-2015-ENG (full text in PDF)

Submission for the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Singapore

Submission for the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Singapore

Today, the ICJ made a submission to the Human Rights Council’s Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review in advance of the Human Rights Council’s review of Singapore.

In its submission, the ICJ expressed concern about the following:
(1) corporal punishment;
(2) the death penalty;
(3) the continued criminalization of consensual same-sex relations;
(4) corporate accountability for companies registered in Singapore; and
(5) international human rights instruments and mechanisms.

A copy of the submission can be found here:

Singapore-ICJ UPR-Advocacy-non legal submission-2015-ENG

 

ICJ-HRCP human rights defenders training in Pakistan

ICJ-HRCP human rights defenders training in Pakistan

In partnership with the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP), the ICJ convened and participated in a one-day workshop on the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) mechanism of the UN Human Rights Council, held in Lahore on 22 November 2014.

The workshop was convened by the ICJ and HRCP as a follow up to, and in response to requests by participants at, training workshops held in Pakistan in February 2014. Now half way between Pakistan’s second and third periodic reviews under the UPR mechanism, the workshop brought together representatives from civil society from throughout Pakistan working on a wide range of human rights issues. It drew from the experience of national and international advocates and human rights lawyers and defenders to discuss:

  • The importance of international human rights law at the national level;
  • The UPR as a mechanism for human rights protection and how it fits within the broader framework of UN human rights mechanisms;
  • Opportunities for NGO engagement in the UPR, especially in the development of a mid-term civil society evaluation report and in preparation for Pakistan’s third cycle UPR in 2017; and
  • Weaknesses in Pakistan’s engagement with the UPR.
Translate »