Российская Федерация: МКЮ и Международная Амнистия вмешиваются по закону «Иностранные агенты»

Российская Федерация: МКЮ и Международная Амнистия вмешиваются по закону «Иностранные агенты»

2 октября МКЮ и Международная Амнистия представили вмешательство в Европейский Суд по правам человека по делу Экозащита и другие против Российской Федерации, заявка №. 9988/13 и 48 других заявок.

Дело касается обозначения НПО как иностранных агентов. В этом документе заявители предоставили Суду анализ, основанный на источниках международного права:

а) сферы применения прав на свободу выражения мнений и ассоциации, гарантированных статьями 10 и 11 Европейской конвенции о защите прав человека (ЕКПЧ или Конвенции), ограничениями на деятельность неправительственных организаций (НПО);

б) применение принципа законности к таким ограничениям;

в) легитимность цели, необходимости и соразмерности мер, регулирующих НПО, включая ограничения на финансирование, обременительные требования к отчетности, санкции и стигматизирующий эффект обозначения НПО как «иностранных агентов»; а также

г) объем допустимых ограничений согласно статье 18 ЕКПЧ, в частности вопрос о вмешательствах, используемых для целей других чем те, которые подпадают под статьи 10 и 11 Конвенции.

В представлении рассматриваются обязательства государств-участников ЕКПЧ с учетом других международных правовых обязательств, таких как обязательства в соответствии с Международным пактом о гражданских и политических правах (МПГПП), а также другие соответствующие стандарты международного права.

Russia-ECtHR-AmicusBrief-Ecodefence-legalsubmissions-2017-ENG (Скачайте вмешательство третьих лиц на английском)

Spain: use of force should be independently investigated

Spain: use of force should be independently investigated

The ICJ today expressed concern at the apparently unlawful violence surrounding yesterday’s referendum in Catalonia, as Catalan authorities sought to hold a vote on the independence of the region. The Spanish Constitutional Court had ruled that the referendum was illegal.

The ICJ calls on all parties concerned to resolve the current crisis in accordance with international human rights law and in the framework of the rule of law.

The ICJ is particularly concerned at allegations of excessive use of force during police operations aimed at enforcing court orders to prevent the referendum being held.

International human rights obligations binding on Spain require that any use of force by agents of the State must be no more than is strictly necessary in the circumstances to meet a grave threat .

All aspects of police operations, including their planning and co-ordination, and the training, guidance and orders given to police officers on the ground, must be designed to minimize the use of physical force.

The ICJ calls for a thorough, prompt and independent investigation into the violence surrounding the referendum, and for those responsible for acts of violence in violation of human rights to be brought to justice.

Background

Spain has obligations to respect the right to life and the right to physical integrity of any person under its jurisdiction under articles 6 and 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and articles 2, 3 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Standards in this regard are re-enforced by the UN Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials and the UN Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials.

Positive obligations under these provisions require that allegations of lethal or potentially lethal force, or force that could amount to cruel inhuman or degrading treatment or torture, be the subject of investigation that is independent and impartial, thorough and prompt.

The violence surrounding the referendum on Catalonia’s independence reportedly resulted in injuries to at least 844 civilians and 33 police offices.

Contacts:

Róisín Pillay, ICJ Europe Programme Director, t: +32 2 734 84 46 ; e: roisin.pillay(a)icj.org

Massimo Frigo, ICJ Senior Legal Adviser, t: +41 22 979 3805 ; e: massimo.frigo(a)icj.org

The DRC urged to hold accountable the company Anvil Mining for its involvement in the “Kilwa massacre”

The DRC urged to hold accountable the company Anvil Mining for its involvement in the “Kilwa massacre”

The ICJ has welcomed the recent decision of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR) on a recent decision found the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) responsible for the massacre of 70 people in Kilwa in 2004.

In its decision, the Commission not only urges the DRC State to pay 2.5 million US dollars compensation to eight victims and their families but also urges the DRC to prosecute Anvil Mining’s personnel involved in the massacre. 

The African Commission also acknowledged the involvement of mining company Anvil Mining, an Australian-Canadian company (later bought by the Chinese company MinMetals) operating a copper and silver mine in Dikulushi, located 50 kilometers from Kilwa, that would
have provided logistical support to soldiers who bombarded civilians.

This decision sheds light on the corporate legal responsibility for human rights abuses, particularly in the extractive
industry sector, and suggests legal avenues for action against Anvil for alleged abuses.

Universal-KilwaMassacre-News-2017-ENG (full pdf ENG)

Translate »