ICJ warns against language of traditional values

ICJ warns against language of traditional values

The ICJ today called on the Human Rights Council and its subsidiary bodies to reject efforts to introduce the language of traditional values into the framework of human rights.

Noting the conclusion of the Council’s Advisory Committee that traditional values can be negative and have been used to justify the subordination of women and other vulnerable or minority groups, the ICJ recalled that emphasis should always be on the implementation of human rights law regardless of tradition and culture.

The ICJ’s statement was delivered today during the General Debate under Item 5 of the Council’s agenda (human rights bodies and mechanisms) as part of the 22nd regular session of the Human Rights Council (25 February to 22 March 2013).

HRC22-Item5GD-TVReport-LegalSubmission-2013 (download statement in PDF)

ICJ and CRR alternative report on Peru to the Human Rights Committee

ICJ and CRR alternative report on Peru to the Human Rights Committee

The ICJ and the Centre for Reproductive Rights (CRR) have addressed the Human Rights Committee on the issue of women’s access to therapeutic abortions in Peru.

In an alternative report for the Committee’s examination of the fifth periodic report of Peru under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the ICJ and CRR submission addresses the failure of Peru to take steps toward implementation of views of the Human Rights Committee and the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (KL v Peru and LC v Peru). Both communications concerned the failure of Peru to enable young women access to therapeutic abortions, found to have amounted to violations of the rights of the applicants.

Peru’s fifth periodic report will be under consideration during the 107th session of the Human Rights Committee (11-28 March 2013), following which the Committee will issue Concluding Observations and recommendations.

Peru-HRCttee107-JointAR-CRR-ICJ-LegalSubmission-2013 (download full submission in Spanish)

Ten eminent jurists join the ICJ Commission

Ten eminent jurists join the ICJ Commission

The ICJ is pleased to announce the election of ten eminent jurists to the ICJ Commission.

Throughout its sixty-year history, the ICJ’s credibility has stemmed from its unique group of eminent jurists and legal experts: the ICJ Commission. ICJ Commissioners provide expert support and strategic direction to the ICJ Secretariat’s regional and thematic programmes.

The following Commissioners have been elected for five-year terms:

Commissioners Elected for First Terms

Prof. Andrew Clapham (UK)

Justice Radmila Dicic (Serbia)

Mr. Shawan Jabarin (Palestine)

Justice Qinisile Mabuza (Swaziland)

Justice Tamara Morschakova (Russian Federation) – from 1st May 2013

Justice Egbert Myjer (Netherlands)

Prof. Victor Rodriguez Rescia (Costa Rica)

Prof. Marco Sassoli (Italy/Switzerland)

Justice Stefan Trechsel (Switzerland)

Prof. Rodrigo Uprimny Yepes (Colombia)

Commissioners Elected for Second Terms

Mr. Roberto Garreton (Chile)

Prof. Robert Goldman (USA)

Commissioners Elected for Third Terms

Justice Ian Binnie (Canada)

Justice Elizabeth Evatt (Australia)

Ms. Karinna Moskalenko (Russian Federation)

Prof. Sir Nigel Rodley (UK)

Mr. Raji Sourani (Palestine)

For further details, including biographies for each of the ICJ’s Commissioners and Honorary Members, please click here .

 

Translate »